bug#63546: nix-channel error: opening pseudoterminal master: No such device

2023-06-07 Thread Haider
Just here to state that I am also getting this error whilst using the nix shepherd service. (I'm on an up-to-date guix system). signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#63546: Nix-channel error

2023-06-07 Thread Haider
Thank you Zihao, I did notice the patch at the time but I didn't assume that it had fixed the issue. I will stay patient for when it will be pushed upstream. Thank you for your efforts. Regards, Haider Mirza signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#63912: python-scikit-learn can't be imported "module compiled against API version 0x10 but this version of numpy is 0xf"

2023-06-07 Thread Edouard Klein
Dear Guix maintainers, If I run: guix shell python-scikit-learn and in it, run: python3 -c "from sklearn.feature_extraction.text import CountVectorizer" I get: RuntimeError: module compiled against API version 0x10 but this version of numpy is 0xf . Check the section C-API incompatibility at the

bug#63902: System containers with --network won't start "In procedure canonicalize-path: No such file or directory"

2023-06-07 Thread edk
Dear Guix developers, To reproduce the bug, take the example container from the documentation: https://guix.gnu.org/cookbook/en/html_node/A-Database-Container.html Create a container from the code: guix system container os.scm Try to run the container: sudo

bug#63904: Can't setuid programs to anybody but root

2023-06-07 Thread edk
Dear Guix developers, At the end of the email is the code for a minimal container, which tries to setuid =true=, the simplest binary of all, to user suc. When line 26 is commented, and the container is built and run with: sudo $(guix system container mwe.scm) One can login to the container and

bug#63289: Any updates?

2023-06-07 Thread Derek
I have the save problem today, is there any updates?

bug#63947: Bug when building ocaml-dune-build-info for ocaml5.0

2023-06-07 Thread Benjamin
Hello, While trying to work with guix and add the ocaml-lsp-server for ocaml@5.0 I think I faced a bug. I did not find the root cause, but I think this is due to the fact of using a combination of (inherit) and (package-with-ocaml5.0). Here is a minimal example to reproduce the bug : ---

bug#63938: Inkscape 1.2.1: No module named 'lxml'

2023-06-07 Thread Andrea PIERRÉ via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hello, I get the following error with Inkscape 1.2.1 (9c6d41e410, 2022-07-14) when I click on the top menu on |Extensions > Manage Extensions|: |Traceback (most recent call last): File

bug#63830: guix pull error

2023-06-07 Thread Aaron Ash
$ guix pull Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to b4382b2 (10,843 new commits)... Building from this channel: guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git b4382b2 substitute:

bug#63864: cryptsetup-static-2.3.7 can't find gcrypt

2023-06-07 Thread Faré
I'm trying to cross-compile Guix for my pinephone pro (arm64) from a x86-64 laptop, as per https://git.sr.ht/~abcdw/guix-pinephonepro, but when I try to add support for encrypted filesystems, guix fails to build cryptsetup-static-2.3.7, with the following error in its configure script: checking

bug#63921: Activation snippets in reverse order, prevent boot

2023-06-07 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
Jelle is right, multiple (delete mingetty-service-type) is not useful. With more thought, what I imagined as more explicit is probably more like (delete "term-tty2") than (delete mingetty-service-type). Also I wouldn’t actually need it. And as Brian says, just use filter. modify-services need

bug#63921: Activation snippets in reverse order, prevent boot

2023-06-07 Thread Brian Cully via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Jelle Licht writes: Thanks for the workaround! Is this "thou shall delete N times, and _exactly_ N times" effect of the recently pushed change functioning as intended? It imho seems pretty brittle and verbose compared to how things were before. We could add a ‘delete-all’ in addition

bug#63948: qtbase@6 retains reference to ‘gcc-final’

2023-06-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
The closure of ‘qtbase’ is unreasonable large, and this is in part because it retains a reference to GCC: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ guix graph -t references --path qtbase /gnu/store/gqld7hz5vm4g904g7nc77z7wzvdrrwyb-zlib-1.2.13

bug#63921: Activation snippets in reverse order, prevent boot

2023-06-07 Thread Jelle Licht
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes: > Hi Ludo, hi all. > [snip] > The following works for me now … > > (modify-services %base-services > (delete login-service-type) > (delete mingetty-service-type) > (delete mingetty-service-type) >

bug#63678: Can't restart/halt system with shepherd 0.9.3 after upgrading

2023-06-07 Thread Christopher Baines
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Christopher Baines skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Christopher Baines skribis: >>> May 24 11:17:02 localhost shepherd[1]: Evaluating user expression (and (defined? (quote transient?)) (map (# ?) ?)). May 24 11:17:02

bug#63868: [reconfigure, shepherd] error: remove: unbound variable

2023-06-07 Thread Attila Lendvai
close 63868 stop TL;DR HEAD of master doesn't exhibit this anymore, it works fine. > Weird. Are there any hints in /var/log/messages? nothing sticks out to me. i saw it on another machine since then, similar config. i had more opportunity to experiment there, and the first commit where the

bug#63921: Activation snippets in reverse order, prevent boot

2023-06-07 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes: > "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes: >> Using clauses at most once broke the greetd example in the manual: > Jelle Licht already reported this on IRC, see the end of > Cc Jelle Licht

bug#63921: Activation snippets in reverse order, prevent boot

2023-06-07 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" writes: > Using clauses at most once broke the greetd example in the manual: Jelle Licht already reported this on IRC, see the end of Regards, Florian

bug#63921: Activation snippets in reverse order, prevent boot

2023-06-07 Thread pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
Hi Ludo, hi all. Ludovic Courtès writes: > I ended up > rewriting ‘modify-services’. Good news is we now have tests for this. In the rewrite, you wrote: > +(define (apply-clauses clauses services) > + "Apply CLAUSES, an alist as returned by 'clause-alist', to SERVICES, a list > +of services.