bug#66227: [bug#66225] [PATCH v3] gnu: emacs-next-minimal: Apply Guix patches.

On 2023-10-06 17:58, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > * gnu/packages/patches/emacs-next-native-comp-driver-options.patch: Add file. > * gnu/packages/patches/emacs-next-exec-path.patch: Add file. > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Register them here. > * gnu/packages/emacs.scm

bug#65665: [PATCH] Really get all the implicit inputs.

Ulf Herrman writes: > Anyway, I've since forgotten exactly what happened and why (I didn't > actually write the commit message until quite some time later), but I > do know that this patch fixed it. > > I might try to rediscover what the problem was later, but thought it > would be good to make

bug#66339: [PATCH gnome-team v4] gnu: dbus-service: make the session available under /run/dbus

Am Mittwoch, dem 04.10.2023 um 12:47 +0200 schrieb Vivien Kraus: > According to > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/3101, glib > now searches for the session bus socket in runstatedir. The dbus > service must thus have its socket in /run/dbus. > > For interoperability with the

bug#66304: exim vulnearable to CVE-2023-42115 et al

Hello, On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 05:25 PM, Wilko Meyer wrote: > * gnu/packages/mail.scm (exim): Update to 4.96.1. > --- > gnu/packages/mail.scm | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/mail.scm b/gnu/packages/mail.scm > index

bug#66339: [PATCH gnome-team v4] gnu: dbus-service: make the session available under /run/dbus

According to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/3101, glib now searches for the session bus socket in runstatedir. The dbus service must thus have its socket in /run/dbus. For interoperability with the dbus standard, /run/dbus is also symlinked to /var/run/dbus. *

bug#66339: [PATCH gnome-team v3] gnu: dbus-service: make the session available under /run/dbus

Am Mittwoch, dem 04.10.2023 um 12:47 +0200 schrieb Vivien Kraus: > According to > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/3101, glib > now searches for the session bus socket in runstatedir. The dbus > service must > thus have its socket in /run/dbus. > > For interoperability with

bug#66339: [PATCH gnome-team v3] gnu: dbus-service: make the session available under /run/dbus

According to https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/merge_requests/3101, glib now searches for the session bus socket in runstatedir. The dbus service must thus have its socket in /run/dbus. For interoperability with the dbus standard, /run/dbus is also symlinked to /var/run/dbus. *

bug#66227: [PATCH v3] gnu: emacs-next-minimal: Apply Guix patches.

* gnu/packages/patches/emacs-next-native-comp-driver-options.patch: Add file. * gnu/packages/patches/emacs-next-exec-path.patch: Add file. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Register them here. * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-next-minimal)[origin](patches): Include the same patches as

bug#64981: GTK4 applications broken (missing libGLESv2)

Hi everyone, Not sure if people saw this patch, has anyone tested if it fixes the problem for them? I can include it in an upcoming mesa-updates branch with other related updates/rebuilds. Hope I got everyone from the original bug thread (seems many replies

bug#59364: gnome clocks does not start due to missing libGLES.so

Hi all, On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 09:47 PM, Simon Streit wrote: > Csepp writes: >> It does work with LIBGL_ALWAYS_SOFTWARE=1, but it would be pretty messed >> up if that had to be enabled globally. > > Thanks for that tip! > > I fired up a recent Fedora live image to see that these applications

bug#66319: Incorrect code snippet in manual

Hi Gabriel, On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 06:38 PM, Gabriel Hondet wrote: > Hello, > > The code snippets of the page 'Sending a patch series' look incorrect to > me: the snippets mention the email address > "guix-patc...@debbugs.gnu.org" but the text mentions > "guix-patc...@gnu.org". > It is

bug#66227: 'emacs-next' is almost unusable

> 'emacs-next' doesn't work. Because native-compilation doesn't work and > it breaks everything else. What exactly doesn’t work? It would be better to actually fix whatever problem there might be than just disabling native compilation. -- Ricardo

bug#65924: git searches coreutils and util-linux commands in PATH

Hi, On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 at 23:41, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> I think we should add coreutils-minimal and sed (or gash-utils?) to the >> ‘git-submodule’ wrapper that already exists. > > That should work for the use case at hand, but we should scan the source > for occurrences of the tools to see

bug#65665: [PATCH] Really get all the implicit inputs.

I've also been using this patch, which rebinds `this-package' within package variants to refer instead to the variant rather than the original. When I tried applying a deep transformation to icecat, it failed to reach icecat-minimal or something like that. Or maybe it was some input of icecat -