bug#65858: mumi crashes

Hi, Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hi Arun, > > Arun Isaac writes: > >> Hi Maxim, >> >> I have made a number of changes to mumi and reconfigured berlin with the >> latest mumi. Here is a quick summary of the main changes to mumi. >> >> - We now log the complete URI and the response code for every

bug#66703: Broken link to Debbugs User Guide

Hi Greg, Greg Hogan writes: > The page > https://guix.gnu.org/devel/manual/en/html_node/Debbugs-User-Interfaces.html > has a broken link "Debbugs User Guide" to the page > https://guix.gnu.org/devel/manual/en/debbugs-ug/index.html#Top. There doesn't seem to be an online HTML version of this

bug#66692: [cuirass] Spurious failed builds following patching u-boot sources

Hi Ludovic! Ludovic Courtès writes: > Ludovic Courtès skribis: > >> /var/log/cuirass-remote-server.log: >> >> 2023-10-23 00:26:06 0 items queued for eventual download >> 2023-10-23 00:26:55 period update: 0 resumable, 0 failed builds. >> 2023-10-23 00:26:58 error: failed to start

bug#65720: [PATCH] git: Shell out to ‘git gc’ when necessary.

>Why not trigger it by “guix gc”? Unless there's a new option I missed, guix gc doesn't handle this. >Well, I expect “guix gc” to take some time and I choose when. However, >I want “guix pull” or “guix time-machine” to be as fast as possible I don't think that things should be pushed into guix

bug#66691: GnuTLS 3.8.1 fails to (cross-)build for GNU/Hurd

Ludovic Courtès skribis: > The recently-committed GnuTLS 3.8.1 fails to (cross-)build for GNU/Hurd: Fixed in a1ac534f8a509bc7ddf11bcd5987fa65adf8c9ca.

bug#66692: [cuirass] Spurious failed builds following patching u-boot sources

Ludovic Courtès skribis: > /var/log/cuirass-remote-server.log: > > 2023-10-23 00:26:06 0 items queued for eventual download > 2023-10-23 00:26:55 period update: 0 resumable, 0 failed builds. > 2023-10-23 00:26:58 error: failed to start worker/database proxy: Invalid > argument EINVAL here most

bug#66692: [cuirass] Spurious failed builds following patching u-boot sources

Hi, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > The build failures are not captured in the logs, which appear truncated, > e.g. from (log empty -- > builder: sjd-p9, worker N38vG7OW) On sjd-p9, I get: --8<---cut

bug#66027: Add a feature to automatically close specified bug reports upon committing.

Hi, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi Maxim, > > If I read correctly, this series had been merged with: > > fb3707762d * etc: teams: Parse 'From' commit more leniently. > f44fa21c3e * gnu: patman: Apply patch for new Change-Id setting. > 8005e09b26 * build: Add a commit-msg hook that

bug#66684: [shepherd] Altering system time renders herd unresponsive

Hi Vladilen, Vladilen Kozin skribis: > My server would consistently run with system time 1h ahead of actual. > Both `date` and `hwclock` would show the same time off by 1hr, while > BIOS showed me correct time. I'm not sure why, but some services won't > run if time difference is e.g. over

bug#65225: [bug#66640] [PATCH 0/2] Build profile hooks for the right system

Simon Tournier skribis: > Do I understand correctly when I consider that > ’(efi-bootloader-profile-hook manifest)’ pass #false as ’system’ and > then it is ’set-guile-for-build’ that sets ’(%current-system)’? Yes. > Somehow, my question is about the readability of default values. > > Why not,

bug#66705: ‘guix shell -CW’ provides a Guix command without extra channels

Hi, On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 18:52, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Actually, the original profile, which contains ‘guix’ and its channels, > *is* available in the environment: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > $ guix time-machine -C <(echo '(cons (channel (name

bug#66610: Acknowledgement (potrace, po4a; guix bug, complete console output)

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 07:42:02PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 07:03:40PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 06:48:26PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:52:13PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote: > > > > > > > > > > And call it,

bug#66610: Acknowledgement (potrace, po4a; guix bug, complete console output)

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 07:03:40PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote: > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 06:48:26PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:52:13PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote: > > > > > > > And call it, or view is it as you may; no trivial task to determine if > > the guix

bug#66653: Should 'guix pack', 'install', ... accept '-f'?

Hi, On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 18:18, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > I feel like that everything that could build a package should accept > the 'standard build options' like -f. > > Does anyone have arguments against it? No arguments against it. :-) Cheers, simon

bug#65665: package-mapping with #:deep? #t doesn't get all the implicit inputs

Hi, On Sat, 21 Oct 2023 at 17:22, Ulf Herrman wrote: >> I don’t know, should we start by having a proper bug report for this and >> study how this happen? [...] >> Again I’m sorry if I’m slow to understand, but I’d like to make sure we >> have a good understanding of the problem before we

bug#66027: Add a feature to automatically close specified bug reports upon committing.

Hi Maxim, If I read correctly, this series had been merged with: fb3707762d * etc: teams: Parse 'From' commit more leniently. f44fa21c3e * gnu: patman: Apply patch for new Change-Id setting. 8005e09b26 * build: Add a commit-msg hook that embeds Change-Id in commit messages. Right?

bug#66610: Acknowledgement (potrace, po4a; guix bug, complete console output)

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 06:48:26PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:52:13PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote: > > > > And call it, or view is it as you may; no trivial task to determine if > the guix binary bug and crash was useful or not. > > But in the process, while for

bug#66705: ‘guix shell -CW’ provides a Guix command without extra channels

Ludovic Courtès skribis: > This is due to the fact that ‘-W’ (‘--nesting’) is implemented by adding > the outer ‘guix’ to the container’s profile, without also adding its > companion profile entries (those that provide channels). Actually, the original profile, which contains ‘guix’ and its

bug#66610: Acknowledgement (potrace, po4a; guix bug, complete console output)

On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 08:52:13PM +0200, Olav Smorholm wrote: > And call it, or view is it as you may; no trivial task to determine if the guix binary bug and crash was useful or not. But in the process, while for other things after; starting to study dmesg. Bluez and related things that awaken

bug#66705: ‘guix shell -CW’ provides a Guix command without extra channels

‘guix shell -CW’ dismisses extra channels available in the original Guix, as illustrated by this example: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ guix time-machine -C <(echo '(cons (channel (name (quote guix-hpc)) (url "https://gitlab.inria.fr/guix-hpc/guix-hpc.git;))

bug#66703: Broken link to Debbugs User Guide

The page https://guix.gnu.org/devel/manual/en/html_node/Debbugs-User-Interfaces.html has a broken link "Debbugs User Guide" to the page https://guix.gnu.org/devel/manual/en/debbugs-ug/index.html#Top.

bug#66647: Installation of RPMs produced by ‘guix pack’ is super slow

tags 66647 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks Hi, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 21:35, Maxim Cournoyer > wrote: > >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- > > [...] > >> [user@fedora Downloads]$ sudo time rpm -i >>

bug#65225: ‘guix shell --system=ALIEN’ builds for both systems

Hi Simon, Simon Tournier writes: > Hi Maxim, > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 18:46, Maxim Cournoyer > wrote: > >> I see the cover letter, but not the patches :-). Where did they go? > > They are in #66640 [1]. The cover letter had been CC: > 65...@debbugs.gnu.org, I guess. Thanks! -- Maxim

bug#65225: ‘guix shell --system=ALIEN’ builds for both systems

Hi Maxim, On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 18:46, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > I see the cover letter, but not the patches :-). Where did they go? They are in #66640 [1]. The cover letter had been CC: 65...@debbugs.gnu.org, I guess. 1: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/66640 Cheers, simon

bug#65720: [PATCH] git: Shell out to ‘git gc’ when necessary.

Hi Ludo, On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 18:15, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > * guix/git.scm (packs-in-git-repository, maybe-run-git-gc): New > procedures. > (update-cached-checkout): Use it. > --- > guix/git.scm | 39 --- > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 3

bug#66647: Installation of RPMs produced by ‘guix pack’ is super slow

Hi, On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 21:35, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- [...] > [user@fedora Downloads]$ sudo time rpm -i > 7m01b0308z5y2pmyn8ywzdj914dxawsl-gmsh-rpm-pack.rpm > 17.26user 10.19system 0:42.31elapsed 64%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata

bug#65225: [bug#66640] [PATCH 0/2] Build profile hooks for the right system

Hi Ludo, A naive question about the default value. On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 16:48, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > packages: Add ‘system’ parameter for ‘set-guile-for-build’. The change reads, --8<---cut here---start->8--- +(define* (set-guile-for-build guile