On Mon, Aug 21, 2023, at 3:37 AM, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> It's terrible that guile.m4 has this feature of preferring numbered
> binaries (even if they're later in PATH, and even if that binary
> doesn't match GUILE_LOAD_*PATHs)
I can see why it does this -- it wants to find the newest
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023, at 5:33 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> The Guile packages currently install all their binaries under their
>> basic name only, e.g.
...
>> This is a problem for building Guix
>> itself from source in a non-pure ‘guix shell -D guix’ on top of a
>> foreign distro that provides a
The Guile packages currently install all their binaries under their
basic name only, e.g.
$ ls /gnu/store/4gvgcfdiz67wv04ihqfa8pqwzsb0qpv5-guile-3.0.9/bin
/gnu/store/4gvgcfdiz67wv04ihqfa8pqwzsb0qpv5-guile-3.0.9/bin:
guild guile guile-config guile-snarf guile-tools
However, the Autoconf macro
After the core-updates merge (specifically after the bump to python 3.10, I
would guess) quodlibet's testsuite has one failing test and therefore the
package fails to build:
=== FAILURES ===
___
`narinfo-best-uri` ends with
```
(match (sort choices (if fast-decompression? (negate speed)
substitute: In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
substitute: 724:2 15 (call-with-prompt _ _ #)
substitute: In ice-9/eval.scm:
substitute: 619:8 14 (_ #(#(#)))
substitute: In guix/ui.scm:
substitute:2275:7 13
