bug#72872: Learning Debbugs - documentation unclear - test

2024-08-29 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
reiseveryone/mumiii -- all the best, jgart

bug#72717: Fwd: Bug in guix size when computing the size of texlive-scheme-full?

2024-08-19 Thread jgart
l: 0.0 MiB all best, jgart https://whereis.xn--q9jyb4c/

bug#72527: Rottlog never exits cleanly

2024-08-08 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi Simon, Thanks for investigating this. Would you be interested in sending a v1 patch with a proposal that fixes the issue. I could then test it. wdyt -- all the best, jgart

bug#70865: Unable to generate a bootable image for pinebook pro

2024-08-06 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
oot-3.1.8.drv.gz'. cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/rn8g7dy2i7dmwlkirnhk3lgx34rya36g-glibc-2.35.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built guix system: error: build of `/gnu/store/rn8g7dy2i7dmwlkirnhk3lgx34rya36g-glibc-2.35.drv' failed -- all the best, jgart

bug#72047: Filter for issues with(out) patch

2024-07-10 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> It looks like there's no filter for issues that have (or lack) patches in > any message. > > I think that would be useful to have in mumi. Hi Vincent, I agree! Would you like to send a patch adding that? -- all the best, jgart

bug#72051: License compliance - pdbpp

2024-07-10 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> Please take any appropriate action to prevent further infringement > while upstream considers their response. Would you be interested in sending a patch for the license in that package once upstream responds? -- all the best, jgart

bug#72029: &nar-error during guix pull on Linux Mint

2024-07-10 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> fwiw - ran the command again and it worked Thanks for the update. Closing this. -- all the best, jgart

bug#71952: documentation inaccuracy?

2024-07-09 Thread jgart
LGTM, Andrew WDYT? -- jgart

bug#71952: documentation inaccuracy?

2024-07-06 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
hi chris, would you like to send a patch fixing this? hi simon, wdyt? -- all the best, jgart

bug#71870: Some broken Go packages (including Podman)

2024-07-02 Thread jgart
Thanks for the link. I'll take a look all best, jgart

bug#71870: Some broken Go packages (including Podman)

2024-07-01 Thread jgart
p us potentially address that and open discussion around it. How do you think that the patch submission process can be improved? I'm going to give a talk in August at the Guix London meetup on patch review, the mumi CLI tool, and my current personal workflow. TBA, jgart

bug#71870: Some broken Go packages (including Podman)

2024-07-01 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> Building the new Podman package fails because building a depdency > (gvisor-tap-vsock) fails: Hi Nils, Would you be interested in sending patches to fix these failures? -- all the best, jgart

bug#71678: Support git commits signed with ssh keys in guix git authenticate

2024-07-01 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
now to keep the backlog of open issues down since this will probably be a while. -- all the best, jgart

bug#71828: Commands that pull channels don't cleanly report errors

2024-06-28 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi, That's a great idea. Do you want to send a patch for that? all best, jgart

bug#69996: Broken OCaml packages (e.g. frama-c and binsec)

2024-06-24 Thread jgart
Hi all, frama-c is now fixed in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71748 all best, jgart https://whereis.みんな/

bug#54094: frama-c doesn't start

2024-06-24 Thread jgart
Hi, This is now fixed in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71748 Thanks, jgart https://whereis.みんな/

bug#71691: Bug found while running 'guix pull'

2024-06-21 Thread jgart
best, jgart June 21, 2024 at 2:19 PM, "Matthew Tuel" wrote: > > **Distro: **Debian 12 Bullseye > **Install Method: **apt > **Internet: **Yes > **Second Attempt:** > Yes right after I sent the bug report and it did the same thing. > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2024, a

bug#71691: Bug found while running 'guix pull'

2024-06-21 Thread jgart
Hi Matthew, Can you mention the following - How you installed Guix - What distro you are on - Did you have internet when you ran this? - Have you tried the command again since the error to see if it succeeds? all best, jgart https://whereis.xn--q9jyb4c/

bug#71689: [PATCH] gnu: update guile-wisp to 1.0.12

2024-06-20 Thread jgart
Hi, Very cool! Thanks for the patch. all best, jgart https://whereis.みんな/

bug#51646:

2024-06-18 Thread jgart
Closing due to staleness

bug#65633: python-selenium raises a WebDriverException because driver is not found in PATH

2023-08-30 Thread jgart
velopment/python-modules/selenium/default.nix#L29 Related references: https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/selenium/#running-browser-tests-on-linux best, jgart

bug#63649: python-zope-exceptions: Build failure (in test_multiline_exception test) with Python 3.10

2023-05-22 Thread jgart
Hi Ivan, Applied. Thanks! all best, jgart

bug#63418:

2023-05-19 Thread jgart
Hi, 62956 resolves this issue. Thanks for working on gajim, nonetheless. Closing this issue. all best, jgart quit

bug#63036: -v or --verbose CLI argument input is undocumented in the CLI

2023-04-23 Thread jgart
User story: jgart tries to build a currently broken Python music package: $ guix build -v 6 music21 Hmmm, what is the allowed input range for -v/--verbosity command line flag? $ guix build --help -v, --verbosity=LEVEL use the given verbosity LEVEL Hmmm, what is the type and/or range of

bug#63020: guix import crate swhkd -r

2023-04-22 Thread jgart
hi, just wanted to capture and report this bug. when I call the following it blows up: $ guix import crate swhkd -r Backtrace: 5 (primitive-load "/home/jgart/.config/guix/current/bin/g…") In guix/ui.scm: 2300:7 4 (run-guix . _) 2263:10 3 (run-guix-command _ .

bug#61309: [PATCH] import: egg: Ignore extra keys for #:repo->guix-package

2023-02-13 Thread jgart
> + #:allow-other-keys) Ah, nice, thanks, allow-other-keys all the way down!

bug#61309: chicken bug in importer: Unrecognized keyword: #:repo->guix-package

2023-02-05 Thread jgart
🐤🐛 I run this: guix import egg spiffy -r I get this: Backtrace: 7 (primitive-load "/home/jgart/.config/guix/current/bin/g…") In guix/ui.scm: 2279:7 6 (run-guix . _) 2242:10 5 (run-guix-command _ . _) In guix/scripts/import.scm: 92:11 4 (guix-import . _) In gu

bug#59566: [PATCH v2 2/2] gnu: emacs-lpy: Update to fa95b11.

2022-11-26 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
* gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-lpy): Update to fa95b11. [propagated-inputs]: Add missing emacs-function-args. --- gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 12 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm index 7eb87b5fe

bug#59566: [PATCH v2 1/2] gnu: Add emacs-function-args.

2022-11-26 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
* gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm (emacs-function-args): New variable. Hi Nicolas, Thanks for the review! Much appreciated. Here's all your requests added in v2. all best, jgart --- gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 26 ++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) diff --git

bug#59363: Fw: [PATCH] flatpak: Adjustments to make --with-commit work

2022-11-19 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
On Sat, 19 Nov 2022 23:05:21 + Jacob Hrbek wrote: > CC mentors -- please review and merge if appropriate Thanks for sending! I'll take a look soon.

bug#59220: guix home does not have a way to uninstall itself

2022-11-12 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hi, guix home does not have a way to uninstall itself. See the following resources for more context: help-guix conversation with ludo: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2022-08/msg00086.html irc conversation about the bug on #tropin on Libera: ``` jgart: symlink-manager have

bug#36551: (no subject)

2022-03-31 Thread jgart
/guixrus/packages/suckless.scm#L207 I can send them all if there is interest in merging them upstream. all best, jgart https://whereis.みんな/ gemini://whereis.みんな/

bug#52139: (no subject)

2021-11-27 Thread jgart
Hi Alex, Would you like to submit a patch to remove those environment variables from being set in the jupyter package?

bug#51696: (no subject)

2021-11-22 Thread jgart
ation: https://spec.matrix.org/latest/ List of matrix servers: https://tatsumoto-ren.github.io/blog/list-of-matrix-servers.html all best, jgart

bug#52047: praat install non-gui binary

2021-11-22 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Praat has a binary that can be installed for non-gui mode. I think it would be cool to add it. https://github.com/void-linux/void-packages/blob/1ec0a967598e7d5c62500b5f2f4d546a29cb6277/srcpkgs/praat/template#L64

bug#50232: Guix pull as root fails

2021-11-20 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 23:41:55 -0500 Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Do you still have > /gnu/store/f2x4iww7rb38hcss42nz8frrjiz3m5z3-subversion-1.14.1.drv > around? λ exa /gnu/store/f2x4iww7rb38hcss42nz8frrjiz3m5z3-subversion-1.14.1.drv "/gnu/store/f2x4iww7rb38hcss42nz8frrjiz3m5z3-subversion-1.14.1.drv

bug#51643: (no subject)

2021-11-07 Thread jgart
On Sun, 07 Nov 2021 02:04:39 -0500 jgart wrote: > matrix-commander: > > https://matrix.org/docs/projects/client/matrix-commander/ This one is blocked for now because we don't have a way to build and package python projects with pyproject build system. We'd have to package

bug#51646: python-furl import bug?

2021-11-07 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
I ran the following command: guix shell bpython -D python-wrapper python-furl -- bpython bpython version 0.20.1 on top of Python 3.8.2 /gnu/store/nckjv3ccwdi6096j478gvns43ssbls2p-python-wrapper-3.8.2/bin/python >>> from furl import furl Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in

bug#51643: (no subject)

2021-11-07 Thread jgart
py to help out in this effort. all best, jgart

bug#51494: guix shell make --rebuild-cache on manifest change

2021-10-29 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
On Sat, 30 Oct 2021 01:08:45 +0200 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > However, as added later on IRC: > > nckx, I think that was a hypothetical bug. I don't think > > he ever tried it with python-lxml > > So I think this bug needs a concrete reproducer before we can > assume its existence. Yes, t

bug#51494: guix shell make --rebuild-cache on manifest change

2021-10-29 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
‎10/29/2021 | 05:18:17 PM ‎jgart‎: civodul, wdyt of `--rebuild-cache` being automatic/the default for guix shell instead of having to explicitly specify the flag to rebuild the cache? ‎10/29/2021 | 05:18:31 PM ‎jgart‎: I think this is the default for docker or how docker works ‎10/29/2021

bug#51424: snooze: malformed installation path

2021-10-26 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 00:13:47 +0200 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Christopher, jgart, Nicolas, > > Christopher Howard 写道: > > the path to the binary is malformed: > > Indeed it was. > > DESTDIR does not mean ‘final destination’; it's meant as a > tempora

bug#51294: closed (Re: bug#51259: Cannot build Guix from source (error messages about the translations))

2021-10-21 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 00:38:02 + help-debb...@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) wrote: Thanks for fixing that! I'll just run this script I've been using again: https://git.sr.ht/~jgart/dotfiles/tree/master/item/bin/executable_guix-prepare-tree

bug#51294: Error/bug: bootstrapping a new guix source tree

2021-10-19 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 04:07:25 +0200 Julien Lepiller wrote: > Le Wed, 20 Oct 2021 04:04:19 +0200, > Julien Lepiller a écrit : > > > I think this is the same as #35519? > > > > > > > > Sorry, I meant #51259 Yup, looks like the same error. $ echo $LANG > en_US.UTF-8 I have glibc-utf8-locales

bug#51294: Error/bug: bootstrapping a new guix source tree

2021-10-19 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
#x27;/home/jgart/guix-reproduce-bug' Making all in po/guix make[2]: Entering directory '/home/jgart/guix-reproduce-bug/po/guix' make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/jgart/guix-reproduce-bug/po/guix' Making all in po/packages

bug#50941: I can confirm this bug too

2021-10-06 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
On Sun, 03 Oct 2021 15:45:34 +0300 Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:01:52AM -0400, jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix > wrote: > > I was going to report this today but Pascal beat me to it. > > > > I get the same error when running `guix h

bug#47260: Wrapping binaries in MediaGoblin Guix Package

2021-10-04 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Just a note that we'll probably have to wrap the binaries that are in this module when we finish making the guix package: mediagoblin/media_types/pdf/processing.py I see that pdftocairo, pdfinfo, and unoconv probably need to be wrapped to point to the executable that is in /gnu/store. See this

bug#50941: I can confirm this bug too

2021-10-02 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Sorry for the unused code in the example.

bug#50941: I can confirm this bug too

2021-10-02 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
I'm forgot to mention that I tested this on void linux. all best, jgart

bug#50941: I can confirm this bug too

2021-10-02 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
om helper for defining groups of packages" `(define ,group-name (map (compose list specification->package+output) ',group-package-names))) (define-tools jgart-profile "emacs-minimal" "offlineimap3" "guile-pipe" "bower" &quo

bug#50232: Guix pull as root fails

2021-08-27 Thread jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... Building from this channel: guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git 0f853ab Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... building /gnu/store/fkh7acn6qcdyva67ik9z7ss69a4vsh1w-subversio

bug#47260: Package GNU MediaGoblin as a Guix service

2021-03-19 Thread jgart
This sounds like a great project. I would love MediaGoblin to be in Guix also. > 6. Rewrite MediaGoblin's JavaScript code not to use jQuery. Maybe > improve the no-bundled-JavaScript video/audio playing experience. What are your thoughts on rewriting the jquery? Should MediaGoblin be using vani