bug#27563: [PATCH] gnu: ghostscript: Don't write document UUID; use "" as instance UUID.

> What’s the impact of simply removing all of this from generated PDF > files? Should we instead make it optional? I don't know. It's just one metadata element - and it's recent. I mean that there are lots of (old) PDF files that don't have it in the first place. > For instance, we could >

bug#27563: [PATCH] gnu: ghostscript: Don't write document UUID; use "" as instance UUID.

Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > * gnu/packages/patches/ghostscript-no-header-uuid.patch: New file. > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > * gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm (ghostscript)[source]: Use it. [...] > --- /dev/null > +++

bug#27563: [PATCH] gnu: ghostscript: Don't write document UUID; use "" as instance UUID.

* gnu/packages/patches/ghostscript-no-header-uuid.patch: New file. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. * gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm (ghostscript)[source]: Use it. --- gnu/local.mk | 1 + gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm | 3 ++-