bug#27563: [PATCH v3 2/2] gnu: ghostscript: Write document ID only when encrypting.

2017-07-08 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:24:07PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: > Okay, thank you for explaining this (especially if you already explained > it! It's hard to join a conversation like this halfway through). I'll > read your patches carefully later today. I didn't get around to it :/ I think that if

bug#27563: [PATCH v3 2/2] gnu: ghostscript: Write document ID only when encrypting.

2017-07-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > I'd vote for an environment variable to disable UUID printing and also > Time header printing. That way it would do everything normally in > regular usage - but when used in packages, it would just not *print* > the problematic stuff. No

bug#27563: [PATCH v3 2/2] gnu: ghostscript: Write document ID only when encrypting.

2017-07-07 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 06:42:25PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Leo Famulari wrote: > > > That leaves the document UUID - and upstream, in some of the other > > I think the lowest risk is to do nothing to Ghostscript and move the PDF > > documentation to a separate

bug#27563: [PATCH v3 2/2] gnu: ghostscript: Write document ID only when encrypting.

2017-07-07 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Leo, On Fri, 7 Jul 2017 12:21:51 -0400 Leo Famulari wrote: > > That leaves the document UUID - and upstream, in some of the other > I think the lowest risk is to do nothing to Ghostscript and move the PDF > documentation to a separate 'doc' output. Then, we could have >

bug#27563: [PATCH v3 2/2] gnu: ghostscript: Write document ID only when encrypting.

2017-07-07 Thread Leo Famulari
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:21:49PM +0200, Danny Milosavljevic wrote: > Yeah, at the upstream bug link > we discussed > that (somewhat). While they don't want to carry the patches (because > they don't want to lose functionality) they explained

bug#27563: [PATCH v3 2/2] gnu: ghostscript: Write document ID only when encrypting.

2017-07-07 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
Hi Ludo, On Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:02:04 +0200 l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Also, do you know whether the PDF specs are OK with that? Yeah, at the upstream bug link we discussed that (somewhat). While they don't want to carry

bug#27563: [PATCH v3 2/2] gnu: ghostscript: Write document ID only when encrypting.

2017-07-07 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > * gnu/packages/patches/ghostscript-no-header-id.patch: New file. > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > * gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm (ghostscript)[source]: Use it. [...] > new file mode 100644 > index 0..3526a300e > ---

bug#27563: [PATCH v3 2/2] gnu: ghostscript: Write document ID only when encrypting.

2017-07-06 Thread Danny Milosavljevic
* gnu/packages/patches/ghostscript-no-header-id.patch: New file. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. * gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm (ghostscript)[source]: Use it. --- gnu/local.mk | 1 + gnu/packages/ghostscript.scm | 1 +