Mathieu Othacehe skribis:
>> Not really. I think we can at least send a heads-up to guix-devel and
>> help-guix.
>
> Ok. Would the attached patch earlier in the thread be ok for you then ?
Sure!
Ludo'.
> Not really. I think we can at least send a heads-up to guix-devel and
> help-guix.
Ok. Would the attached patch earlier in the thread be ok for you then ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> I agree with you. As long as the entry labels clearly show which one is
>> the most recent, that sounds good.
>>
>> However! On headless machines, we’d rather make sure users know about
>> this change. On our Libreboot “bayfron
Hi Ludovic,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I agree with you. As long as the entry labels clearly show which one is
> the most recent, that sounds good.
>
> However! On headless machines, we’d rather make sure users know about
> this change. On our Libreboot “bayfront” server, GRUB for
Hello,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> Mathieu Othacehe writes:
>
>> This seems like a good idea ! If we decide to make it unconditional the
>> patch attached does the job. We can also make it configurable in
>> bootloader-configuration for instance.
>>
>> WDYT ?
>
> Thank you, Mathieu! I doubt that
Mathieu Othacehe writes:
> This seems like a good idea ! If we decide to make it unconditional the
> patch attached does the job. We can also make it configurable in
> bootloader-configuration for instance.
>
> WDYT ?
Thank you, Mathieu! I doubt that there's a need to make this
configurable, bu
Hi,
This seems like a good idea ! If we decide to make it unconditional the
patch attached does the job. We can also make it configurable in
bootloader-configuration for instance.
WDYT ?
Mathieu
>From 3ec63fb55a074b547724c70d560cc61776c9298e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Othacehe
Date
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> This is a pretty minor issue, but I've found that the "GNU system, old
> configurations..." part of the menu would be nicer if the most recent
> generations were listed at the top, rather than the oldest generations.
>
> Currently it lists generation 1 as the first ent
That's actually a pretty good idea!
Vagrant Cascadian writes:
> Hi!
>
> This is a pretty minor issue, but I've found that the "GNU system, old
> configurations..." part of the menu would be nicer if the most recent
> generations were listed at the top, rather than the oldest generations.
>
> Cu
Hi!
This is a pretty minor issue, but I've found that the "GNU system, old
configurations..." part of the menu would be nicer if the most recent
generations were listed at the top, rather than the oldest generations.
Currently it lists generation 1 as the first entry in the list, and if
I've got
10 matches
Mail list logo
