Efraim Flashner writes:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:42:18PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> Efraim Flashner writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> >> 'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of
>> >> a package, not
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:42:18PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> Efraim Flashner writes:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> >> 'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of
> >> a package, not propagated-inputs.
> >
> > The attached
Efraim Flashner writes:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
>> 'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of
>> a package, not propagated-inputs.
>
> The attached patch should add the propagated inputs to the list of
> inputs to check. Do we
On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote:
> 'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of
> a package, not propagated-inputs.
The attached patch should add the propagated inputs to the list of
inputs to check. Do we want to start telling it to ignore
'guix lint -c inputs-should-be-native' only checks the 'inputs' field of
a package, not propagated-inputs.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
