Pavel Shlyak writes:
> This one is done with https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55806. I suggest closing it
> as resolved.
Indeed. With 55806, the uvesafb is added if (supported-package? v86d
system), avoiding the need to check the system. I’m Closing by sending
a mail to 41120-d...@debbugs.gnu.org.
This one is done with https://issues.guix.gnu.org/55806. I suggest closing it
as resolved.
I wrote the attached quick fix, then noticed that this bug is
paired with #29296 which seems to propose a whole 'nother
mechanism?
I'm not sure I grok the latter's advantage yet.
Kind regards,
T G-R
From 29d6ce59a0f3953de627d110adaa7978051ca077 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tobias Geerinckx
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 09:30:27PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:40:15AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > the uvesafb-service which was added to the installation image isn't
> > supported on aarch64 (or probably any non-x86 system) and causes the
> > creation of an instal
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 08:40:15AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> the uvesafb-service which was added to the installation image isn't
> supported on aarch64 (or probably any non-x86 system) and causes the
> creation of an installation image to fail.
This is still an issue, right?
Hey Ludo,
> Anyway, it took me much more time than I thought, but it’s here now:
>
> 502f609d05 vm: Use 'let-system'.
> 300a54bb98 utils: 'target-arm32?' & co. take an optional parameter.
> 644cb40cd8 gexp: Add 'let-system'.
> d03001a31a gexp: Compilers can now return lowerable objects.
Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Othacehe skribis:
> Here's a rebased version of Ludo's patch. I'm not sure about the merge
> resolution in "lower-object", but otherwise it works fine!
I took another look, and you’re right, it does the job. There were a
couple of issues: returning a self-quoting value as i
Hi,
Mathieu Othacehe skribis:
> Here's a rebased version of Ludo's patch. I'm not sure about the merge
> resolution in "lower-object", but otherwise it works fine!
>
> Ludo, would it be of to push it?
I’d like to think a bit more about it. In particular, ‘let-system’ is
not great because we’d
Hello,
> We could maybe do something like that:
>
> (define (operating-system-hardware-specific-services)
> #~(let-system (system target)
> (cond
> ((target-arm? system target)
> '())
> ((target-intel? system target)
>
Hello,
Thanks for working on that Florian & Efraim.
> + (if (and (string-suffix? "linux-gnu" %host-type)
> +(or (string-prefix? "x86_64" %host-type)
> +(string-prefix? "i686" %host-type)))
> + #~(lambda ()
> +
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:55:13PM +0200, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> I have more success with moving the file-exists check into the
> #~(lambda …) like the attached patch.
Sorry I forgot to git add. This is the patch.
>From f88b1b487d48c959a7ed00d6032ccfe05aa81f0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 200
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 11:12:34AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> I haven't tested the produced image, but the following builds without
> trying to also build v86d
>
> (start
>(if (and (and (string-suffix? "linux-gnu" %host-type)
> (or (string-prefix?
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:06:21AM +0200, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
>
> Hello Efraim,
>
> > the uvesafb-service which was added to the installation image isn't
> > supported on aarch64 (or probably any non-x86 system) and causes the
> > creation of an installation image to fail.
>
> Thanks for rep
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:06:21AM +0200, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
>
> Hello Efraim,
>
> > the uvesafb-service which was added to the installation image isn't
> > supported on aarch64 (or probably any non-x86 system) and causes the
> > creation of an installation image to fail.
>
> Thanks for rep
Hello Efraim,
> the uvesafb-service which was added to the installation image isn't
> supported on aarch64 (or probably any non-x86 system) and causes the
> creation of an installation image to fail.
Thanks for reporting. There's this small snippet in uvesafb-service:
--8<---cut he
the uvesafb-service which was added to the installation image isn't
supported on aarch64 (or probably any non-x86 system) and causes the
creation of an installation image to fail.
--
Efraim Flashner אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality can
16 matches
Mail list logo
