bug#44187: Channel clones lack SWH fallback

Hi, zimoun skribis: > On Sat, 18 Sept 2021 at 23:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote: [...] >> > How a chosen-prefix attack could work here? I understand why the second >> > preimage attack is an issue. But I miss how the SHA-1 chosen-prefix attack >> > could be exploited here to compromise the user,

bug#44187: Channel clones lack SWH fallback

Hi, On Sat, 18 Sept 2021 at 23:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > zimoun skribis: > > and after more than 12h, the status is still: «SWH vault: Processing...» > > and nothing is complete. > > Did it eventually succeed? We obviously have no guarantee as to how > long it might take to cook a bundle.

bug#44187: Channel clones lack SWH fallback

Hello! zimoun skribis: > The original URL of the channel was: > . And this channel > defines a package where the upstream has also disappeared > . Note the URL in the > package definition is not bogus…

bug#44187: Channel clones lack SWH fallback

Hi, On Sat, 18 Sept 2021 at 12:05, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > zimoun skribis: > > Does it make sense to pass this ’swhid’ equal to ’swh:1:rev’ with the > > ’flat’ archive-type? Another instance is, [...] > > and from my understanding, again ’swhid’ depends on ’archive-type’. > > Therefore, it

bug#44187: Channel clones lack SWH fallback

Hi! zimoun skribis: > The patch LGTM although there is a redundancy, from my understanding. > > On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 at 16:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> @@ -694,7 +714,15 @@ wait until it becomes available, which could take >> several minutes." >> (format log-port "SWH: found revision ~

bug#44187: Channel clones lack SWH fallback

Hi Ludo, The patch LGTM although there is a redundancy, from my understanding. On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 at 16:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > @@ -694,7 +714,15 @@ wait until it becomes available, which could take > several minutes." > (format log-port "SWH: found revision ~a with directory at '~

bug#44187: Channel clones lack SWH fallback

Hi, On ven., 10 sept. 2021 at 16:34, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Finally we can enjoy content-addressability and brittle URLs > are becoming a thing of the past!* Yeah, it is awesome! The original URL of the channel was: . And this channel defin