On 2021-10-24, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2021-10-24, zimoun wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 04:22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>>> "This packages", "This modules", "allows to" and "permits to" in package
>>> descriptions.
>>> * tests/lint.scm: Add tests for "This packages" and "allows to".
>
On 2021-10-24, zimoun wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 04:22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> From a171769da0f737468e06866164eadf1e720764ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vagrant Cascadian
>> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 04:00:15 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] lint: Add description check for common typos.
>>
Hi,
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 04:22, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> So close! Ludo spotted that the for-each needed to be replaced with
> append-map, and that basically did it!
Indeed, I have not checked the type of full chain. :-) And the return
value probably needs to be strongly a list, instead of
On 2021-10-22, zimoun wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 16:18, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>
>> It has been rewritten to easily add new typo checks, but this one so far
>> only addresses pluralized "This packages". Would be easy enough to add
>> "allows to" but hard to add a suggested fix...
>
> If I r
Hi Vagrant,
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021 at 16:18, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> It has been rewritten to easily add new typo checks, but this one so far
> only addresses pluralized "This packages". Would be easy enough to add
> "allows to" but hard to add a suggested fix...
If I remember correctly the pre
On 2021-06-09, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> There have been at least three newly added "This packages" since I
> submitted this patch, so wondering if we can at least get the simple
> case merged before getting too caught up in all the potential
> improvements?
And up until today, that list grew to
On 2021-05-04, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
>
>> From 4e724fbe9815e1c27967b835f08d2259164538ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Vagrant Cascadian
>> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:26:45 -0700
>> Subject: [PATCH] lint: Add description check for pluralized "This package"
>>
>> Pa
Hi Vagrant,
Vagrant Cascadian skribis:
> From 4e724fbe9815e1c27967b835f08d2259164538ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vagrant Cascadian
> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:26:45 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] lint: Add description check for pluralized "This package"
>
> Partial fix for: https://issues.guix
On 2021-04-25, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:10:40PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> Control: tags 44675 +patch
>>
>> On 2020-11-15, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> > Please consider a guix lint description/synopsis check for basic
>> > spelling, typo and rudimentary grammar i
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:10:40PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Control: tags 44675 +patch
>
> On 2020-11-15, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > Please consider a guix lint description/synopsis check for basic
> > spelling, typo and rudimentary grammar issues.
> ...
> > Many of these are likely to
Vagrant Cascadian schreef op do 22-04-2021 om 10:57 [-0700]:
> On 2021-04-22, Maxime Devos wrote:
> > + (define (check-pluralized-this-package description)
> > +"Check that DESCRIPTION does not contain This packages"
> >
> > The sentence structure would be clearer if you used quotes here,
> >
On 2021-04-22, Maxime Devos wrote:
> + (define (check-pluralized-this-package description)
> +"Check that DESCRIPTION does not contain This packages"
>
> The sentence structure would be clearer if you used quotes here,
> something like "Check that DESCRIPTION does not contain ‘This packages’".
+ (define (check-pluralized-this-package description)
+"Check that DESCRIPTION does not contain This packages"
The sentence structure would be clearer if you used quotes here,
something like "Check that DESCRIPTION does not contain ‘This packages’".
+(if (string-match "This packages" des
Control: tags 44675 +patch
On 2020-11-15, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Please consider a guix lint description/synopsis check for basic
> spelling, typo and rudimentary grammar issues.
...
> Many of these are likely to be caught by most spell checking routines;
> I'm not sure if there is anything th
Hi Vagrant,
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 at 17:53, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Please consider a guix lint description/synopsis check for basic
> spelling, typo and rudimentary grammar issues.
>
> Most of the ones I've found were caught by debian's "lintian" tool:
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/lintian
Please consider a guix lint description/synopsis check for basic
spelling, typo and rudimentary grammar issues.
Most of the ones I've found were caught by debian's "lintian" tool:
https://tracker.debian.org/lintian
Common issues appear to be:
"This packages" -> "This package"
"allows to
16 matches
Mail list logo
