Leo Famulari 写道：
If anyone is wondering why we didn't notice failures of packages
that
depend on rust, the canonical 'rust' packages is rust-1.45, but
these
failures seem to only affect later versions of rust.
Thanks. I am reverting the update on master for now.
Kind regards,
T G-R
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:50:13PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
> The recent llvm 11.0.0 -> 11.0.1 change seems to have broken rust on the
> master branch.
If anyone is wondering why we didn't notice failures of packages that
depend on rust, the canonical 'rust' packages is rust-1.45, but
The recent llvm 11.0.0 -> 11.0.1 change seems to have broken rust on the
master branch.
