bug#46385: User awareness of Anti-Features

2022-06-09 Thread Maxim Cournoyer
Hi, Ludovic Courtès writes: [...] >> * ads (I don't think any application in Guix has these?) >> * tracking (should be patched out if possible) >> * non-free-network-services >> * non-free-dependencies (probably not allowed in upstream Guix, but maybe in >> a channel) >> >> The code behind

bug#46385: User awareness of Anti-Features

2021-02-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Maxime Devos skribis: > I'll have to think some more on whether this is something Guix needs, but I > do have a partial concrete implementation proposal: > > Packages can have a ‘properties’ field, e.g. from > gnu/packages/bioconductors.scm: > > (define-public r-reactome-db > (package >

bug#46385: User awareness of Anti-Features

2021-02-10 Thread Leo Famulari
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 01:28:40PM +, soheil--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Users should be aware of anti-feature of packages. > It is best to have anti-feature tag in anti-feature packages so that user > know which program has anti-features; Like F-Droid. Also, user should be >

bug#46385: User awareness of Anti-Features

2021-02-10 Thread Maxime Devos
Hi, On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 13:28 +, soheil--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Users should be aware of anti-feature of packages. > It is best to have anti-feature tag in anti-feature packages so that user know > which program has anti-features; Like F-Droid. Also, user should be aware

bug#46385: User awareness of Anti-Features

2021-02-10 Thread soheil--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Users should be aware of anti-feature of packages. It is best to have anti-feature tag in anti-feature packages so that user know which program has anti-features; Like F-Droid. Also, user should be aware of anti-feature during installation. And wherever this awareness is needed... An example is