Hello Simon,
Simon Streit writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>> I'm guessing the i386 does something bogus? Your x86_64 is already able
>> to run i386 code natively, AFAIK.
>
> Alright, this was my interpretation from the manual and available
> architectures that I just plugged it all together
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> I'm guessing the i386 does something bogus? Your x86_64 is already able
> to run i386 code natively, AFAIK.
Alright, this was my interpretation from the manual and available
architectures that I just plugged it all together like that. I wasn't
aware that x86_64 can
Hello Simon,
Simon Streit writes:
> Simon Streit writes:
>> So why would my system brake the bootstrap binary? Has it got to do
>> with a particular package I have in my profile(s)? I generally build
>> Guix with ‘guix environment --pure guix.’ I have a second Guix build
>> machine running.
Simon Streit writes:
> So why would my system brake the bootstrap binary? Has it got to do
> with a particular package I have in my profile(s)? I generally build
> Guix with ‘guix environment --pure guix.’ I have a second Guix build
> machine running. The packages used there are quite
Hello Maxime,
Maxime Devos writes:
> Some questions:
>
> * What's the hash of gnu/packages/bootstrap/i686-linux/bash?
>
> (Run guix hash gnu/packages/bootstrap/i686-linux/bash)
>
> I have 1ig8a4bhc7fpw8zrnw4l568wmmcb29rlwg4jbih3imb4x6d9l1gd.
> If you see something different, your copy is
Hey Mark,
Mark H Weaver writes:
> Also check the permissions of gnu/packages/bootstrap/i686-linux/bash.
> It should be 0555, i.e. "-r-xr-xr-x", and ditto for 'mkdir' in the same
> directory. I vaguely recall someone running into a similar problem many
> years ago because the executable bit was
Hi,
Maxime Devos writes:
> * What's the hash of gnu/packages/bootstrap/i686-linux/bash?
>
> (Run guix hash gnu/packages/bootstrap/i686-linux/bash)
>
> I have 1ig8a4bhc7fpw8zrnw4l568wmmcb29rlwg4jbih3imb4x6d9l1gd.
> If you see something different, your copy is probably corrupt.
Also check
Simon Streit schreef op vr 27-08-2021 om 21:53 [+0200]:
> This is another follow up after having actually read the relevant info
> section on how to do proper testing in Guix.
>
> Checkout is at 5422920b9eaaa0c6bf779588748595c66ca86ba3, and this time I
> prepared a test-suite.log with all errors
