Hello,
> Also, substitute availability for aarch64-linux and armhf-linux is
> OK. Does that mean this issue can be closed?
The guix package for armhf-linux is not built anymore by
ci.guix.gnu.org, but guix for aarch64-linux seems to be working.
Closing,
Thanks,
Mathieu
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:28:28AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> I tried building a newer version, but there were new test suite failures
>> on both aarch64 and x86_64 :/
>
> Since the 'guix' package still does not build on aarch64, I'm reopening
> this bug.
It
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 08:54:24PM +, Pierre Langlois wrote:
>> > Since the 'guix' package still does not build on aarch64, I'm reopening
>> > this bug.
>>
>> Oh it doesn't? What hash are you on?
>
> I'm not using aarch64, so I can't give a commit hash. I am
On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 08:54:24PM +, Pierre Langlois wrote:
> > Since the 'guix' package still does not build on aarch64, I'm reopening
> > this bug.
>
> Oh it doesn't? What hash are you on?
I'm not using aarch64, so I can't give a commit hash. I am observing the
build farm's support for
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:28:28AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
>> I tried building a newer version, but there were new test suite failures
>> on both aarch64 and x86_64 :/
>
> Since the 'guix' package still does not build on aarch64, I'm reopening
> this bug.
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 11:28:28AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I tried building a newer version, but there were new test suite failures
> on both aarch64 and x86_64 :/
Since the 'guix' package still does not build on aarch64, I'm reopening
this bug.
On 2022-01-17, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2022-01-17, Pierre Langlois wrote:
>> Chris Marusich writes:
>>> Chris Marusich writes:
>
If nobody has further comments, I will commit the attached version to
master in about 24 hours.
>>>
>>> I've committed this in
On 2022-01-17, Pierre Langlois wrote:
> Chris Marusich writes:
>> Chris Marusich writes:
>>> If nobody has further comments, I will commit the attached version to
>>> master in about 24 hours.
>>
>> I've committed this in 24c3485bb3ffc05e687ef6513ac287b8d3048bab. We
>> still need to update the
Hi,
Chris Marusich writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> Hi,
>
> Chris Marusich writes:
>
>> If nobody has further comments, I will commit the attached version to
>> master in about 24 hours.
>
> I've committed this in 24c3485bb3ffc05e687ef6513ac287b8d3048bab. We
> still need to update
Hi,
Chris Marusich writes:
> If nobody has further comments, I will commit the attached version to
> master in about 24 hours.
I've committed this in 24c3485bb3ffc05e687ef6513ac287b8d3048bab. We
still need to update the "guix" package, so even if you run "guix pull"
right now, you won't be
Hi Pierre,
FYI, it looks like you included bug-guix@gnu.org in the CC list of your
last email. If you do that, I believe it will create a new bug report,
which may not be what you intended to do.
Pierre Langlois writes:
> I'm afraid I don't have any new insight if this is an issue or just
>
Hi Chris,
Chris Marusich writes:
(snip)
> It seems fishy that on aarch64-linux, there is no NEEDED entry for
> ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 in the ELF files under consideration. As shown
> above, a similar entry DOES exist on both x86_64-linux and
> powerpc64le-linux. For this reason, it seems
Aiko Kyle writes:
> On the latest master I can run 'guix pull', and the latest guix seems
> to build just fine, however when I go to do 'guix system reconfigure',
> building guix fails the check phase.
Aiko has reported that the fix for 52908 did indeed fix the
"tests/guix-system.sh" problem on
Some of these failing tests have been reported on guix-devel already:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2021-12/msg00158.html
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 6:13 PM Akira Kyle wrote:
>
> Attached is the current log file for the test suite on commit 92faad0
> with the patch applied.
The attached patch fixes the failing guix-system.sh test on aarch64.
However there are now other tests that are failing.
0001-tests-guix-system-Fix-on-non-x86_64-systems.patch
Description: Binary data
On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 9:51 PM Leo Famulari wrote:
>
> Thanks, and I've attached a graph of the same operating system
> declaration from the same revision of Guix but for x86_64, along with
> rendered images of both graphs.
>
> The graphs clearly show that xorg-server is provided in two places on
Attached is the output of guix system shepherd-graph
gnu/system/examples/desktop.tmpl on commit 2a49ddb513
graph.dot
Description: MS-Word document
On Sat, Jan 01, 2022 at 04:54:51PM -0700, Aiko Kyle wrote:
> I'm new to guix so I'm really struggling to debug this strange issue.
> On the latest master I can run 'guix pull', and the latest guix seems
> to build just fine, however when I go to do 'guix system reconfigure',
> building guix fails
18 matches
Mail list logo
