bug#53027: Backtrace with `guix pull --debug=2`

2022-01-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Maxime Devos skribis: > Oskar Berndal schreef op wo 05-01-2022 om 16:19 [+0100]: >>    179:23  2 (update-build #< building: () downloadin…> …) >> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >>   1685:16  1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) >>   1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) >> >>

bug#53027: Backtrace with `guix pull --debug=2`

2022-01-05 Thread Oskar Berndal
Wow, you were able to reproduce. I feared that this would just be lost to the sands, but apparently not. Nicely done!!! :-D

bug#53027: Backtrace with `guix pull --debug=2`

2022-01-05 Thread Maxime Devos
Oskar Berndal schreef op wo 05-01-2022 om 16:19 [+0100]: >    179:23  2 (update-build #< building: () downloadin…> …) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >   1685:16  1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) >   1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) > > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure

bug#53027: Backtrace with `guix pull --debug=2`

2022-01-05 Thread Maxime Devos
Oskar Berndal schreef op wo 05-01-2022 om 16:19 [+0100]: I tried running `guix pull` with the `--debug=2` flag. However, it led a backtrace, that I include at the bottom. I tried the command twice with the same backtrace, and then I tried without the debug flag, simply running `guix pull`. This

bug#53027: Backtrace with `guix pull --debug=2`

2022-01-05 Thread Oskar Berndal
I tried running `guix pull` with the `--debug=2` flag. However, it led a backtrace, that I include at the bottom. I tried the command twice with the same backtrace, and then I tried without the debug flag, simply running `guix pull`. This worked without error. Trying to run with the debug flag