bug#55326: libgit2 1.3.0 includes a time-dependent test

2022-06-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Maxime Devos skribis: > I noticed that the latest core-updates evaluations fail because of the > test failure in libgit2@1.3.0: > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates > > so I recommend merging 'master' into 'core-updates'. Done in 8c3e9da13a3c92a7db308db8c0d81cb474ad7799 (and I hope I

bug#55326: libgit2 1.3.0 includes a time-dependent test

2022-06-03 Thread Maxime Devos
I noticed that the latest core-updates evaluations fail because of the test failure in libgit2@1.3.0: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates so I recommend merging 'master' into 'core-updates'. Greetings, Maxime. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

bug#55326: libgit2 1.3.0 includes a time-dependent test

2022-05-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Maxime Devos skribis: > Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 09-05-2022 om 10:49 [+0200]: >> Right, and remaining computers will have RISC-VII 100 MHz CPUs anyway. > > I assume you meant 100GHz here instead? Or very fast software that > doesn't need fast CPUs ... I did mean MHz but I don’t want to spo

bug#55326: libgit2 1.3.0 includes a time-dependent test

2022-05-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Heya, Carl Dong skribis: > I opened a pull request upstream that just removes the specific test for > “HEAD@{10 years ago}". Since that functionality is well-covered by subsequent > tests. > > See here for the PR: https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/pull/6299 >

bug#55326: libgit2 1.3.0 includes a time-dependent test

2022-05-09 Thread Carl Dong
I opened a pull request upstream that just removes the specific test for “HEAD@{10 years ago}". Since that functionality is well-covered by subsequent tests. See here for the PR: https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/pull/6299 > Though maybe by that

bug#55326: libgit2 1.3.0 includes a time-dependent test

2022-05-09 Thread Maxime Devos
Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 09-05-2022 om 10:49 [+0200]: > Right, and remaining computers will have RISC-VII 100 MHz CPUs anyway. I assume you meant 100GHz here instead? Or very fast software that doesn't need fast CPUs ... signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

bug#55326: libgit2 1.3.0 includes a time-dependent test

2022-05-09 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Maxime Devos skribis: > Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 09-05-2022 om 00:11 [+0200]: >> Fixed: >> >>   e48b5484afde93294c4ed7215e88ed450842b2e5 (master) >>   f5fe0082abe4547f3fb9f29d8351473cfb3a387b (staging) > > It's still time-dependent though: > >> + (substitute* "tests/refs/re

bug#55326: libgit2 1.3.0 includes a time-dependent test

2022-05-09 Thread Maxime Devos
Ludovic Courtès schreef op ma 09-05-2022 om 00:11 [+0200]: > Fixed: > >   e48b5484afde93294c4ed7215e88ed450842b2e5 (master) >   f5fe0082abe4547f3fb9f29d8351473cfb3a387b (staging) It's still time-dependent though: > + (substitute* "tests/refs/revparse.c" > +((

bug#55326: libgit2 1.3.0 includes a time-dependent test

2022-05-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Ludovic Courtès skribis: > libgit2 1.3.0 (and 1.4.3, it seems) includes a time-dependent test: > ‘refs::revparse::date’, in ‘tests/refs/revparse.c’, assumes > “HEAD@{10 years ago}” doesn't match anything in the sample repositories, > which is no longer true: Fixed: e48b5484afde93294c4ed7215e8

bug#55326: libgit2 1.3.0 includes a time-dependent test

2022-05-08 Thread Ludovic Courtès
libgit2 1.3.0 (and 1.4.3, it seems) includes a time-dependent test: ‘refs::revparse::date’, in ‘tests/refs/revparse.c’, assumes “HEAD@{10 years ago}” doesn't match anything in the sample repositories, which is no longer true: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ date