Hi,
On Tue, 01 Aug 2023 at 17:37, Adam Porter wrote:
> I don't know enough about Guix to understand why using "guix install"
> with the package transformation option caused the runtime problem with
> gcc, but everything does seem to work with the updated definition.
See Josselin’s
Hi Adam,
Adam Porter writes:
> OTOH, if anyone knows why the transformation option failed in that way,
> it might be helpful to solve it if possible, so users could use the
> option to install future releases without having to modify the package
> definition. (AFAIK, I was able to do that
FYI, I hacked together a new package definition, updating the emacs-next
one to build 29.1 from the release tarball, and after installing it,
everything seems to work, including native compilation.
I don't know enough about Guix to understand why using "guix install"
with the package