Hi,
Morgan Smith writes:
> Hello guix!
>
> Before I get into the actual bug I'm trying to report, I have to bring up 2
> other complications.
>
> 1. qtwayland@6 currently doesn't build due a test failure. So in this bug I'm
> either using "--without-tests=qtwayland" on the command line or
>
Hi Morgan,
Morgan Smith writes:
> Well if I understand how "guix size" works, then adding qtwayland would only
> add 30 or 80 MiB, which in my opinion isn't a lot. My vote is on just adding
> qtwayland to all wayland packages (at the cost of a full qt rebuild).
Just dropping by to say that I
Hello guix!
Before I get into the actual bug I'm trying to report, I have to bring up 2
other complications.
1. qtwayland@6 currently doesn't build due a test failure. So in this bug I'm
either using "--without-tests=qtwayland" on the command line or
"((options->transformation '((without-tests
