bug#65787: time-machine is doing too much network requests

2023-09-11 Thread Simon Tournier
Oops, missing diff for clarity. :-) On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 at 11:41, Simon Tournier wrote: > If yes, here two examples: Adding ’pk’ where ’remote-fetch’ and ’branch-lookup’ are called. diff --git a/guix/git.scm b/guix/git.scm index 1cb87a45607b..0209826c5c00 100644 --- a/guix/git.scm +++

bug#65787: time-machine is doing too much network requests

2023-09-11 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi Ludo, > Maybe this is the purpose of your message: > reducing Git remote accesses in those cases? Yes. :-) On Sun, 10 Sep 2023 at 22:10, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > It would probably be easier if you could come with > an example where there’s

bug#65787: time-machine is doing too much network requests

2023-09-10 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello Simon, This is a long message; I agree with the intent (avoiding network traffic when the required commit is already in cache), but I’m not sure about the analysis. It would probably be easier if you could come with an example where there’s Git-related network traffic where there

bug#65787: time-machine is doing too much network requests

2023-09-06 Thread Simon Tournier
Hi, Well, I am in a quest to make Guix more robust for the worst-case scenario: Savannah is unreachable (as well as other servers). For context, it matters when using Guix for reproducing scientific production. An example of such worst-case, see [1]. Well, this quote: The first