Hi Josselin,
On 2023-09-14 14:13, Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote:
> Couldn't we report those missing dependencies upstream then?
This can be done, in theory it's nothing too complicated and all it takes
is simply add a DEPENDS.txt file to the repository.
If you're interested
Hello,
Josselin Poiret via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>
>> We use dependencies specified in TeX Live itself (as in "texlive.tlpdb"
>> file), for sanity reasons. There are 4000+ packages; I think it is not
>> reasonable to grep through their output to find the
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> We use dependencies specified in TeX Live itself (as in "texlive.tlpdb"
> file), for sanity reasons. There are 4000+ packages; I think it is not
> reasonable to grep through their output to find the unspecified
> dependencies. It will also be terrible when
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> We use dependencies specified in TeX Live itself (as in "texlive.tlpdb"
> file), for sanity reasons. There are 4000+ packages; I think it is not
> reasonable to grep through their output to find the unspecified
> dependencies. It will also be terrible when
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Daniel Meißner via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes:
>
[...]
>> I can provide a patch if desired to add texlive-xstring and
>> texlive-bigfoot to texlive-acronym’s (propagated-)inputs. The suffix
>> package appears to be bundled with
Hello,
Daniel Meißner via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes:
> The following MWE does not compile with pdflatex using the modular
> texlive packages:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{acronym}
>
> \begin{document}
>
Hi Guix!
The following MWE does not compile with pdflatex using the modular
texlive packages:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{acronym}
\begin{document}
\end{document}
--8<---cut
