bug#53463: ci.guix.gnu.org not building the 'guix' job

Also, the 'master' job hasn't been run in ~2 days: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/master I think the build farm is waiting to finish collecting garbage.

bug#53289: Removing QtWebKit

On Sat, Jan 15, 2022 at 02:34:24PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > We need to remove QtWebKit from the distro. > I'll be happy to see it removed. -- Efraim Flashner רנשלפ םירפא GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or

bug#53480: i686 ISO image from CI is installing an x86_64 system

Ahmad Draidi schreef op zo 23-01-2022 om 14:02 [+]: > noticed that when downloading the i686 ISO image from > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/412940/details > (1ga8sl5f2qry2n7wm9fjvhafzhsb7p4r-image.iso) the installer's kernel > and installed system are x86_64 Build ID412940 Evaluation

bug#53480: i686 ISO image from CI is installing an x86_64 system

Hello Guix hackers, I noticed that when downloading the i686 ISO image from https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/412940/details (1ga8sl5f2qry2n7wm9fjvhafzhsb7p4r-image.iso) the installer's kernel and installed system are x86_64. If I install from the official guix-system-install-1.3.0.i686-linux.iso I

bug#53459: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: bug#53459: error while installing with existing partitions

> retitle 53459 installer: uuid->string failure backtrace (again) merge 54480 53459 thanks

bug#53459: error while installing with existing partitions

Néstor Arocha schreef op za 22-01-2022 om 21:34 [+]: > Originally I tried as the only distribution in the system, but grub- > efi > wouldn't get installed or recognised by the bios on boot. Make sure the computer's boot process is configured to the correct mode -- UEFI or BIOS (sometimes

bug#53459: error while installing with existing partitions

retitle 43459 installer: uuid->string failure backtrace (again) merge 54480 43459 thanks This seems to be the same issue as . > I forgot to mention that I am working with current stable guix 1.3.0 There's no ‘stable’ Guix; Guix 1.3.0 is just a snapshot of a

bug#53339: [version-1.4.0] Package with texlive-updmap.cfg and texlive-amsfonts failing to find Euler

Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> elaexuo...@wilsonb.com writes: >> >>> Attached patch on top of version-1.4.0 attempts to typset PDF docs for the >>> metamath package. However, the below error results, which seems to indicate >>> that the Euler fonts are not found, despite

bug#53459: Tried non efi boot, independent boot partition and boot entry from another linux

Hi, I forgot to mention that I am working with current stable guix 1.3.0 I also tried a few things: * Manual installation doesn't trigger the error at all, but the end result is that it won't boot like before * an independent boot partition on top of a shared /boot/efi didn't make any

bug#53459: Update: Tried non efi, independent boot partition and custom boot entry in debian

Hi, I forgot to mention that I am working with current stable guix 1.3.0 I also tried a few things: * Manual installation doesn't trigger the error at all, but the end result is that it won't boot like before * an independent boot partition on top of a shared /boot/efi didn't make any

bug#53459: Update: Tried non efi, independent boot partition and custom boot entry in debian

Hi, I forgot to mention that I am working with current stable guix 1.3.0 I also tried a few things: * Manual installation doesn't trigger the error at all, but the end result is that it won't boot like before * an independent boot partition on top of a shared /boot/efi didn't make any

bug#53459: error while installing with existing partitions

Hi, I was trying to get guix installed on my x86_64 machine. (icore 3, 16Gb RAM, 1TB ssd, ethernet working, using the guix curses installer) Originally I tried as the only distribution in the system, but grub-efi wouldn't get installed or recognised by the bios on boot. Instead I decided to

bug#53047: (No Subject)

i have updated my local checkout to: ``` commit 7b5f7810a7461970e03bbc7bd25259589c63394a (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Mathieu Othacehe Date: Wed Jan 19 10:58:47 2022 +0100 gnu: cuirass: Update to 1.1.0-11.9f08035. * gnu/packages/ci.scm (cuirass): Update to

bug#40558: Modular TexLive "Insufficient extension fonts" and duplicate fonts

elaexuo...@wilsonb.com writes: >> At least the question “is texlive-amsfonts broken” is definitively >> answered. This was what this issue was about, no? I’d rather keep the >> other issue separate. > > Well, it's still broken in the sense that we're not able to typeset with > eufm10, no?

bug#53462: Guile 2.0.14: check fails on i686

Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli schreef op zo 23-01-2022 om 01:33 [+0100]: > > cadcbbaf65 gnu: r-bigmelon: Add r-knitr. > guile 2.0.14 fails tests. According to "guix refresh -l", ‘only’ 83 packages depend on guile@2.0.14: guile2.0-shepherd@0.8.1 libchop@0.5.2 geda-gaf@1.10.2 gnubik@2.4.3

bug#53462: Guile 2.0.14: check fails on i686

Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli schreef op zo 23-01-2022 om 01:33 [+0100]: > Hi, > > With Guix system i686, at the following commit: > > cadcbbaf65 gnu: r-bigmelon: Add r-knitr. > guile 2.0.14 fails tests. > > I've attached the log. > > I'm unsure what to do here as it's Guile 2.0.14 and on Guile