i just got here while i wanted to test my new hunspell-dict-hu package using
libreoffice.
i briefly looked at the issue, and there's no mention of ASPELL_DICT_DIR in
libreoffice.scm, nor in the wrapper files that i have checked. this might be an
invalid expectation, though.
--
• attila
Unfortunately, guix-jupyter still fails to build for me as of commit
29d52a56f2d254781b65dbec0f1009db0b9d06e6.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
==
Guix-Jupyter 0.2.2: ./test-suite.log
14 de septiembre de 2022, 5:07, "bdju" escribió:
>
> On Tue Sep 13, 2022 at 6:55 AM CDT, bdju wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon Sep 12, 2022 at 10:32 PM CDT, bdju via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> > wrote:
> > After upgrades I no longer have the `dragon` command that is used by the
> > dragon-drop
[re-sending again, this time with debbugs in CC]
Hello,
Morgan Smith writes:
> Hello!
>
> Ever since commit 1f466ed6be932526fc69e72ffd50390691d0d382 we don't look
> at the user's value of QT_PLUGIN_PATH. The comment says this is to
> prevent plugin confusion between Qt5 and Qt6 stuff.
Yes;
As experienced by Luks6655, you can't do
(define inferior (inferior-with-channels CHANNELS))
on the top-level of a channel module. I think the issue is that
inferior-with-channels is eager (not lazy), so it cannot be used in a
channel on the top-level, as builds (including channel builds)
On Tue Sep 13, 2022 at 6:55 AM CDT, bdju wrote:
> On Mon Sep 12, 2022 at 10:32 PM CDT, bdju via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote:
> > After upgrades I no longer have the `dragon` command that is used by the
> > dragon-drop package, making the program unusable. The package is still
> > in my manifest
Hello,
Giovanni Biscuolo skribis:
> IMHO yes, we should revert the tdlib upgrade /or/ keep a packaged
> tdlib@1.8.0 used by emacs-telega v. 0.8.3
[...]
> If I don't get it wrong, I still have commit access to the guis repo so
> I could revert the commit on tdlib, but I'd like to have an OK.
>
Hi André and Ludovic,
André A. Gomes writes:
[...]
> It's working for me too, following your steps!
Fine, so we have an easy procedure to "roll back" the telega-server
status folder; this means a new desktop application authentication that
will appear as a new "device" (probably followed by
Hi Ludo,
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022 at 16:41, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> I don’t know if there is a way to catch such mistakes early. Field
>> sanitizers?
>
> Yes, we should do that. We can arrange to have most checks done at
> compile time, similar to how the ‘synopsis’ and ‘description’ sanitizers
