Hi Ludovic,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Hey!
>>>
>>> Konrad Hinsen skribis:
>>>
This looks good to me. In practice, I doubt anyone would use -q with
time-machine, because it makes more sense to specify an explicit
Am Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 03:17:55PM +0200 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> I think it is simpler to to use a new module, as there's currently much
> work going on in "tex.scm".
As nothing depends on it, I have just pushed the changes to master and
deleted the wip branch. Thanks for your comments,
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hey!
>>
>> Konrad Hinsen skribis:
>>
>>> This looks good to me. In practice, I doubt anyone would use -q with
>>> time-machine, because it makes more sense to specify an explicit channel
>>> file every time.
>>
>> Yeah. The use case
Hi,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hey!
>
> Konrad Hinsen skribis:
>
>> This looks good to me. In practice, I doubt anyone would use -q with
>> time-machine, because it makes more sense to specify an explicit channel
>> file every time.
>
> Yeah. The use case I have in mind is something like:
>
>
Hello,
Andreas Enge writes:
> Are you okay with me either pushing the package in its own texlive module
> where it is now, or moving the definition back into the tex module?
I think it is simpler to to use a new module, as there's currently much
work going on in "tex.scm".
Indeed, I'm
Am Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 01:54:58PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> Okay then, fine to remove biber again!
Done in wip-texlive-mono. I also dropped disabling tests for mips64,
as anyway we have no means of testing the architecture any more, so I see
no point in complicating the build recipe.
Where
Am Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 10:48:16PM +0200 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
> I don't know if the monolithic texlive from the wip branch does, but the
> current monolithic `texlive' can be installed without fuss alongside
> `texlive-biber'. I don't expect additional issues with `texlive' from
> the "wip"
Hey!
Konrad Hinsen skribis:
> This looks good to me. In practice, I doubt anyone would use -q with
> time-machine, because it makes more sense to specify an explicit channel
> file every time.
Yeah. The use case I have in mind is something like:
guix time-machine -q --commit=XYZ -- build
