bug#39712: Partitions produced by the installer not properly unmounted?

2020-03-13 Thread Mathieu Othacehe


This is fixed by 64704be417ab6f2788e8e3bc36fede1db35470e7.

Thanks,

Mathieu





bug#39712: Partitions produced by the installer not properly unmounted?

2020-02-22 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi,

Mathieu Othacehe  skribis:

>> But I think the problem should show up even with “make check-system
>> TESTS=installed-os” on master.

Hmm I’m not sure this is true.

> Well this does not involve the graphical installer, so I'm not sure to
> understand.
>
> Anyway, testing the installer in Qemu, I can reproduce a failure where
> the first umount in "umount-cow-store" throws an exception (busy
> device), when umounting a crypted partition.

On current ‘wip-installer-test’
(0699b97f7df8708a000eb7bfb043c2cef6672dc3), you can run:

  make check-system TESTS=gui-installed-os

(It should succeed.)

If you take the /gnu/store/…-installation item produced and mount it as
I showed before in this thread, you should see a “recovery complete”
message from the kernel.

Note that LUKS is not involved at all in this case, and ‘umount’ doesn’t
throw.

Ludo’.





bug#39712: Partitions produced by the installer not properly unmounted?

2020-02-22 Thread Mathieu Othacehe


Hey Ludo,

> But I think the problem should show up even with “make check-system
> TESTS=installed-os” on master.

Well this does not involve the graphical installer, so I'm not sure to
understand.

Anyway, testing the installer in Qemu, I can reproduce a failure where
the first umount in "umount-cow-store" throws an exception (busy
device), when umounting a crypted partition.

That's probably what's bitting you, so to be continued!

Thanks,

Mathieu





bug#39712: Partitions produced by the installer not properly unmounted?

2020-02-21 Thread Mathieu Othacehe


Hey Ludo,

Nice progress on that branch :)

> Could it be a side effect of the MS_MOVE dance in
> 1d02052067e04d7dd8fd1ec17557ca02a30b9bcf?

Could be, I ran the following command on wip-installer-test branch:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
make check-system TESTS=gui-installed-os
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

But it appears to get stuck at this step:

--8<---cut here---start->8---
conversation expecting pattern ((quote pause))
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

I'll try to investigate further later on.

Thanks,

Mathieu





bug#39712: Partitions produced by the installer not properly unmounted?

2020-02-21 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Mathieu,

I noticed that partitions created by the installer appear to not be
properly unmounted, at least when running in the context of (gnu tests
install):

--8<---cut here---start->8---
ludo@ribbon ~$ qemu-img convert -O raw 
/gnu/store/2d3s2nbb3j2c1hmkz52xds9rfbk4q3x3-installation /tmp/broken.raw
ludo@ribbon ~$ sudo losetup -P /dev/loop0 /tmp/broken.raw 
ludo@ribbon ~$ sudo dmesg |tail -3
[10703.869334] kvm [8936]: vcpu0, guest rIP: 0xac073dad disabled 
perfctr wrmsr: 0xc2 data 0x
[10742.475623] kvm [8957]: vcpu0, guest rIP: 0xaf073dad disabled 
perfctr wrmsr: 0xc2 data 0x
[11774.318468]  loop0: p1 p2 p3
ludo@ribbon ~$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/loop0
Disk /dev/loop0: 2.15 GiB, 2306867200 bytes, 4505600 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk identifier: 213AE251-0E91-499E-9184-0CCEC6DA64C7

DispositiuStart   Final Sectors  Size Tipus
/dev/loop0p1   2048614340962M BIOS boot
/dev/loop0p2   6144  231423  225280  110M Intercanvi Linux
/dev/loop0p3 231424 4503551 42721282G Linux filesystem
ludo@ribbon ~$ sudo mount /dev/loop0p3 /mnt/usb
ludo@ribbon ~$ sudo dmesg |tail -3
[11774.318468]  loop0: p1 p2 p3
[11803.975300] EXT4-fs (loop0p3): recovery complete
[11803.977277] EXT4-fs (loop0p3): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. 
Opts: (null)
--8<---cut here---end--->8---

However, I’ve added logging in ‘umount-user-partitions’ in (gnu
installer parted), and the installer does seem to unmount partitions
correctly.

Could it be a side effect of the MS_MOVE dance in
1d02052067e04d7dd8fd1ec17557ca02a30b9bcf?

(I’m observing this on ‘wip-installer-tests’, roughly based on
117d8467be232bcc1b0136d04f362d95d975ca95.)

Thanks,
Ludo’.