Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
>> WDYT?
>
> That's even better. Why did you use trailing whitespaces?
So there are two spaces after sentence-terminating periods.
Ludo’.
> WDYT?
That's even better. Why did you use trailing whitespaces?
Nikita
Hi,
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> There are two ways to fix the problem. We can create new licenses for
> such packages (e.g. 'bzip2'), but it will be tricky. I propose to use
> the following variable instead:
>
> (define bsd-like
> (license "BSD-like"
>#f
> "This is not a
Hi,
I've found out that we can't use (guix licenses) right now; 'bzip2'
and 'flex' use BSD-like licenses that differ from 'bsd-2', 'bsd-3',
and 'bsd-4'.
There are two ways to fix the problem. We can create new licenses for
such packages (e.g. 'bzip2'), but it will be tricky. I propose to use
the
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> How to change the recipes that are already in the repo? Should we do
> it in a single commit?
Yes, in a single commit. Just use a simple ‘sed’ script or similar.
Ludo’.
> Next step will be to use it everywhere.
How to change the recipes that are already in the repo? Should we do
it in a single commit?
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> From 714e8352e34633edf6721ba32eed0bcc902281a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nikita Karetnikov
> Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 01:48:17 +
> Subject: [PATCH] Add (guix licenses).
>
> * guix/licenses.scm: New file.
> * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it.
Applied, thanks!
Ne
I've attached the patch.
'comment' is for various notes. (It's not necessarily a URI.)
From 714e8352e34633edf6721ba32eed0bcc902281a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Karetnikov
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 01:48:17 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add (guix licenses).
* guix/licenses.scm: New file.
* Makefi
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
>> Can you make this a single #:export?
>
> Which one should I use? (The latter looks better, IMHO.)
The latter, yes.
>> While we’re at it, we should add a ‘url’ field to , so that the
>> URL above would be a field of the license object instead of being a
>> comment.
> Can you make this a single #:export?
Which one should I use? (The latter looks better, IMHO.)
#:export (license? license-name asl2.0 boost1.0 bsd-2 bsd-3 bsd-4
cddl1.0 cpl1.0 epl1.0 gpl2 gpl2+ gpl3 gpl3+ ijg ibmpl1.0 lgpl2.1
lgpl2.1+ lgpl3 lgpl3+ mpl2.0 openssl public-
Hi again,
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> +(define-record-type
> + (license name)
> + license?
> + (name license-name))
[...]
> +;;; https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list#apache2
> +(define asl2.0 (license "ASL 2.0"))
While we’re at it, we should add a ‘url’ field to , so that the
URL ab
Hi,
Nikita Karetnikov skribis:
> From eb8229c7834dd1d249e8f5adc8382d00b289aa00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Nikita Karetnikov
> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:39:57 +
> Subject: [PATCH] Add (guix licenses).
>
> * guix/licenses.scm: New file.
> * Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it.
Thanks, looks g
I've attached the patch.
What do you think?
From eb8229c7834dd1d249e8f5adc8382d00b289aa00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nikita Karetnikov
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 22:39:57 +
Subject: [PATCH] Add (guix licenses).
* guix/licenses.scm: New file.
* Makefile.am (MODULES): Add it.
---
Makefile.am
Hi,
Jeff Mickey skribis:
> I think the important part here is if you use strings, have some way
> to check if someone is building a package with a new/undocumented
> license. Then the graph of license objects could be accomplished
> later, if you know you don't have misspellings like "LGLPv2" an
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> More importantly, licensing is not a science, and we can’t pretend to
> devise a universal “license calculus”. (This has been discussed at
> length in the past on nix-dev.)
>
> Thus, I would start with a simple (guix licenses) module. I
nd BSD with
> advertising? Is there a list of abbreviations for licenses?
Nixpkgs uses this:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/lib/licenses.nix
which is a subset of this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
> As far as I can tell, 'license' doesn't c
Hi,
I'm trying to package 'util-linux'. It uses several licenses:
- GPLv3+
- GPLv2+
- GPLv2
- LGPLv2+
- BSD with advertising
- Public Domain
What are the common abbreviations for Public Domain and BSD with
advertising? Is there a list of abbreviations for licenses?
As fa
17 matches
Mail list logo