bug#31109: Retroarch: source tarball has wrong hash

Hi Rutger, Rutger Helling skribis: > Here's what diffoscope gave me (old vs. new). OK, thanks for sharing. So it looks like they modified the “1.7.1” tag upstream, leading to a different tarball. I’m appending the actual changes below (extracted from what you sent.)

bug#31109: Retroarch: source tarball has wrong hash

Hello, Rutger Helling skribis: > The tarball changed. I ran a diff and couldn't find anything malicious > in the changes so I updated the checksum just now. Out of curiosity, could you post the changes as reported by running ‘diff -ur --no-dereference’ on the extracted

bug#31109: Retroarch: source tarball has wrong hash

Hi Ludo, The tarball changed. I ran a diff and couldn't find anything malicious in the changes so I updated the checksum just now. On 2018-04-09 10:44, l...@gnu.org wrote: > Hello, > > I get: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > $ guix build >

bug#31109: Retroarch: source tarball has wrong hash

Hello, I get: --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ guix build /gnu/store/csv3ibcqacvk1l6np1f6ch5f62gz1yw0-retroarch-1.7.1.tar.gz.drv The following derivation will be built: /gnu/store/csv3ibcqacvk1l6np1f6ch5f62gz1yw0-retroarch-1.7.1.tar.gz.drv @ build-started