Hello,
I'm closing this one as you pushed the patch.
Mathieu
Wait. Rust depends on clang? I'm pretty sure that's not the case.
The only time gnu/packages/rust.scm refers to clang is to delete it.
pgpRZYqAXEuED.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> Marius: I believe this will only cause a rebuild for clang and not
> llvm, which means that it only affects ~30 packages. Perhaps this can
> go in master? Would love to know your thoughts.
There is also the problem that IceCat depends on Rust which depends on
Clang as stated by Mark.
Mathieu
Thank you so much Mathieu for the patch!
Marius: I believe this will only cause a rebuild for clang and not llvm, which
means that it only affects ~30 packages. Perhaps this can go in master? Would
love to know your thoughts.
Cheers,
Carl Dong
cont...@carldong.me
"I fight for the users"
Mathieu Othacehe writes:
> From f126146880e3904f39728313dfc10288b51fc23a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mathieu Othacehe
> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:05:54 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: clang-from-llvm: Fix set-glibc-file-names phase.
>
> * gnu/packages/llvm.scm (clang-from-llvm)[arguments]:
This patch is a bit more viable that the previous one I think.
Mathieu
>From f126146880e3904f39728313dfc10288b51fc23a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Othacehe
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:05:54 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: clang-from-llvm: Fix set-glibc-file-names phase.
*
Hi Carl,
On +2019-10-30 20:48:55 +, Carl Dong wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Our clang toolchain seems to be quite broken at this time. In particular, it
> fails to call `ld` in the right way such that the startfiles are picked up:
>
I suppose you know that guix ld is more complex than plain vanilla
Hello Carl,
The attached patch fixes it for me, but this piece of code should be
rewritten so that we don't have the same failure at every clang major
version update.
WDYT?
Mathieu
>From ac0cf4e25f9acdb02bee402b45a8f31a4830fcb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Othacehe
Date: Thu, 31 Oct
