Hi!
Andreas Enge skribis:
> Am Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:25:05PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Court鑚:
>> Could you instead try the latest patch?
>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47007#6
>
> it looks like my reply was missed, I tried this patch, and it solves the
> problem for me, as for Jelle. So please
Hello,
Am Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 12:25:05PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Could you instead try the latest patch?
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47007#6
it looks like my reply was missed, I tried this patch, and it solves the
problem for me, as for Jelle. So please push.
Thanks!
Andreas
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Enge skribis:
> incidentally I stumbled upon the same problem as Jelle today.
>
> Am Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 05:17:10PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> Could you try the attached patch?
Could you instead try the latest patch?
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47007#6
Thanks!
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Here’s a more sensible patch for you to try. This time it should
> correctly determine the necessary mount flags based on statfs(2) info.
>
> Could you apply it and report back?
I can confirm that it does what it says on the tin :-).
Thanks again!
- Jelle
Hello,
On 3/9/21 12:18 PM, Jelle Licht wrote:
FWIW, I only have this issue on Guix System: on my Ubuntu 20.04.2 things
JustWork(tm)
Thanks for taking a look,
- Jelle
I can confirm similar issues on my Guix Systems from below:
canonical file name:
Am Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:00:30PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Here’s a more sensible patch for you to try. This time it should
> correctly determine the necessary mount flags based on statfs(2) info.
> Could you apply it and report back?
This one works like a charm, thanks a lot!
Andreas
Hello,
incidentally I stumbled upon the same problem as Jelle today.
Am Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 05:17:10PM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> Could you try the attached patch?
It raises an error:
$ ./pre-inst-env guix environment -C --ad-hoc coreutils
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1736:10 17
Here’s a more sensible patch for you to try. This time it should
correctly determine the necessary mount flags based on statfs(2) info.
Could you apply it and report back?
TIA!
Ludo’.
diff --git a/gnu/build/file-systems.scm b/gnu/build/file-systems.scm
index aca4aad848..304805db62 100644
---
Hi,
Jelle Licht skribis:
> There you go:
>
> 26123 stat("/gnu/store/mmhimfwmmidf09jw1plw3aw1g1zn2nkh-bash-static-5.0.16",
> {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0555, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
> 26123 mkdir("/tmp", 0777) = -1 EEXIST (File exists)
> 26123 mkdir("/tmp/guix-directory.9IH6jJ", 0777) = -1
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> Jelle Licht skribis:
>
>> I only tried this on x86_64 guix systems, one with Linux kernel 5.11.2,
>> and also on a Linux-libre kernel 4.14.223.
>>
>> Running the equivalent of a `git bisect' starting some months back to
>> today's master, and with the following
Hi,
Jelle Licht skribis:
> I only tried this on x86_64 guix systems, one with Linux kernel 5.11.2,
> and also on a Linux-libre kernel 4.14.223.
>
> Running the equivalent of a `git bisect' starting some months back to
> today's master, and with the following test to select bad/good bisect
>
Hello guix,
I only tried this on x86_64 guix systems, one with Linux kernel 5.11.2,
and also on a Linux-libre kernel 4.14.223.
Running the equivalent of a `git bisect' starting some months back to
today's master, and with the following test to select bad/good bisect revisions:
`./pre-inst-env
12 matches
Mail list logo
