Hi,
Maxime Devos writes:
> On 03-09-2022 11:43, zimoun wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, 03 Sep 2022 at 00:25, Maxim Cournoyer
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Should we close it as 'notabug', or persist with the attempt to wrap the
>>> cling binary with the include paths required to ease its setup?
>> From my
On 03-09-2022 11:43, zimoun wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 03 Sep 2022 at 00:25, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
Should we close it as 'notabug', or persist with the attempt to wrap the
cling binary with the include paths required to ease its setup?
From my understanding about what cling is, we have a similar
Hi,
On Sat, 03 Sep 2022 at 00:25, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Should we close it as 'notabug', or persist with the attempt to wrap the
> cling binary with the include paths required to ease its setup?
>From my understanding about what cling is, we have a similar issue with
some others packages.
Hello,
Liliana Marie Prikler writes:
> Am Dienstag, dem 09.08.2022 um 15:32 -0700 schrieb Gang Liang:
>> I had a fresh installation of cling from guix, and got the following
>> error. Seems some system headers are missing.
> You probably need gcc-toolchain installed alongside cling.
Indeed:
$
I had a fresh installation of cling from guix, and got the following
error. Seems some system headers are missing.
Tried it on two machines, and both had the same problem.
** CLING **
* Type C++ code and press enter to run it *
* Type .q to exit
Am Dienstag, dem 09.08.2022 um 15:32 -0700 schrieb Gang Liang:
> I had a fresh installation of cling from guix, and got the following
> error. Seems some system headers are missing.
You probably need gcc-toolchain installed alongside cling.
HTH
