bug#27179: gtk+ in dependency graph for qt

2017-08-22 Thread Ludovic Court├Ęs
Efraim Flashner skribis: > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 11:16:32PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:23:44PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> > >> > Efraim Flashner writes: >> > >> > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 09:14:40AM +0300,

bug#27179: gtk+ in dependency graph for qt

2017-08-10 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 11:16:32PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:23:44PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > > > Efraim Flashner writes: > > > > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 09:14:40AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > > >> gtk+ is currently in the

bug#27179: gtk+ in dependency graph for qt

2017-07-02 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 09:23:44PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Efraim Flashner writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 09:14:40AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> gtk+ is currently in the dependency tree for qt, but is not an input. > >> Either we should add gtk+ as

bug#27179: gtk+ in dependency graph for qt

2017-07-02 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Efraim Flashner writes: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 09:14:40AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> gtk+ is currently in the dependency tree for qt, but is not an input. >> Either we should add gtk+ as an input so the styling can be uniform >> between the two toolkits, or we

bug#27179: gtk+ in dependency graph for qt

2017-07-02 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 09:14:40AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > gtk+ is currently in the dependency tree for qt, but is not an input. > Either we should add gtk+ as an input so the styling can be uniform > between the two toolkits, or we should find which input pulls it in and > see what other

bug#27179: gtk+ in dependency graph for qt

2017-06-01 Thread Efraim Flashner
gtk+ is currently in the dependency tree for qt, but is not an input. Either we should add gtk+ as an input so the styling can be uniform between the two toolkits, or we should find which input pulls it in and see what other options we have for removing it from the graph. -- Efraim Flashner