bug#27500: [website] wrong link to talk

[I couldn't find instructions on generating patches for the web pages.] Under https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/help/ the second occurrence of /software/guix/guix-fosdem-hpc-part1-20170204.pdf should have "part1" changed to "part2".

bug#27467: Xfce broken, because it propagates two different versions of gtk+

Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> >>> Mark H Weaver skribis: >>> I just tried to update my GuixSD system to commit c57b56722f6c167c5a285f47802047de85a356ae on master.

bug#27467: Xfce broken, because it propagates two different versions of gtk+

Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.4K bytes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > > > Mark H Weaver writes: > > > >> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> > >>> Mark H Weaver skribis: > >>> > I just tried to update my GuixSD system to commit >

bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Could you check whether “guix package -A syncthing” shows it there? The > warning should appear as soon as we’re upgrading a package that’s > missing. I get no results when I do `./pre-inst-env guix package -A syncthing` from the

bug#27491: Indentation issue in emacs

Arun Isaac (2017-06-26 02:35 +0530) wrote: > I'm not entirely sure this is the right place to report this > bug. If I should report this bug elsewhere, please direct me. > > When I indent the `emacs-which-key' package definition in > gnu/packages/emacs.scm using `indent-region', the description

bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages

Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Could you check whether “guix package -A syncthing” shows it there? The >> warning should appear as soon as we’re upgrading a package that’s >> missing. > > I get no results when I do

bug#27314: guix includes wrong directory in build environment

Hi ng0, config.log reads this: > configure:9394: gcc -c > -I/gnu/store/5cbyk5gmw2gj017d02vyibz3v6rdldz7-gnunetgf-0.10.114b59076f/include > -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -g -O2 > -I/gnu/store/5cbyk5gmw2gj017d02vyibz3v6rdldz7-gnunetgf-0.10.114b59076f/include > conftest.c >&5 > In file

bug#27294: R importer fails to create a list for multiple licenses

Joshua Sierles skribis: > For example, 'guix cran import RgoogleMaps' generates this line: > (license (gpl2+ gpl3+)). Build fails unless changing the line to: > (license (list gpl2+ gpl3+)). Fixed in 94a400bebae48aebc35fb84aa0b134b25ce46e46, thanks! Ludo’.

bug#27386: offloading documentation and env

ng0 skribis: > And this is from master running an offloading test as it is right now. > Both ends have GuixSD. > > user@abyayala ~$ guix offload test > guix offload: testing 1 build machines defined in > '/usr/local/etc/guix/machines.scm'... > guix offload:

bug#27314: guix includes wrong directory in build environment

Ludovic Courtès transcribed 0.9K bytes: > Hi ng0, > > config.log reads this: > > > configure:9394: gcc -c > > -I/gnu/store/5cbyk5gmw2gj017d02vyibz3v6rdldz7-gnunetgf-0.10.114b59076f/include > > -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -g -O2 > >

bug#27386: offloading documentation and env

Ludovic Courtès transcribed 2.1K bytes: > ng0 skribis: > > > And this is from master running an offloading test as it is right now. > > Both ends have GuixSD. > > > > user@abyayala ~$ guix offload test > > guix offload: testing 1 build machines defined in > >

bug#27262: guix package -r FOO -u . should not upgrade FOO

Mark H Weaver skribis: > When removing and upgrading packages in a single invocation of "guix > package", removed packages should be automatically excluded from the set > of packages to upgrade. Fixed in fc8fdcf56ecc159cb4e85ffdde60a54c4fa5c04f, thanks! Ludo’.

bug#27388: acknowledged by developer (control message for bug #27388)

GNU bug Tracking System transcribed 0.4K bytes: > This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report > #27388: offloading: Add support for keyfile-less keys as used by GnuPG, > which was filed against the guix package. > > Thank you for your report, which has now been closed. > You can

bug#27467: Xfce broken, because it propagates two different versions of gtk+

Ludovic Courtès writes: > Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > >> Mark H Weaver writes: >> >>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >>> Mark H Weaver skribis: > I just tried to update my GuixSD system to commit >

bug#27489: glibc fails to build on i686

Mark H Weaver writes: > I believe this problem is fixed by commit > ffc015bea26f24d862e7e877d907fbe1ab9a9967. I was able to build a grafted > 'hello' for i686-linux, and it worked correctly. > > Can you try it and report back? Thank you! It seems to have worked. -- Ricardo

bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages

Hello, Leo Famulari skribis: > I ran `guix pull` after this missing package warning was implemented, > but before I pushed afc9d8ec2b724b67f (gnu: Add jmtpfs). > > I installed jmtpfs from a Git checkout, and then ran `guix package -u .` > > As expected, Guix complained that

bug#27429: Stack clash (CVE-2017-1000366 etc)

Hi Mark, Mark H Weaver skribis: > I tried to copy the .drv files for the grafted 'glibc-final' and > 'glibc-final-with-bootstrap-bash' from my machine to Hydra, in order to > ask Hydra to build it, but both "guix copy" and "guix archive --export" > failed: > > mhw@jojen ~$ guix

bug#27467: Xfce broken, because it propagates two different versions of gtk+

Mark H Weaver writes: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Mark H Weaver skribis: >> >>> I just tried to update my GuixSD system to commit >>> c57b56722f6c167c5a285f47802047de85a356ae on master. "guix system build" >>> failed with the following