Re: io_select EPIPE error case? [Was: [PATCH] Prepare pflocal/io.c for a revised hurdselect.c: Pipe case (for review)]

On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:55:19AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: About the behavior change, I'd tend to agree, but I'd rather get others' opinion too. I guess what you actually want to fix is the error case on poll()? (actually here the only error that can happen is EPIPE) (that would have

Re: io_select EPIPE error case? [Was: [PATCH] Prepare pflocal/io.c for a revised hurdselect.c: Pipe case (for review)]

Richard Braun, le Mon 26 Nov 2012 14:30:40 +0100, a écrit : On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:55:19AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: About the behavior change, I'd tend to agree, but I'd rather get others' opinion too. I guess what you actually want to fix is the error case on poll()?

Re: io_select EPIPE error case? [Was: [PATCH] Prepare pflocal/io.c for a revised hurdselect.c: Pipe case (for review)]

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:34:04PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: In the read case, the end of file will be detected by a zero-read, not an EPIPE. Right. What about the SELECT_URG/POLLPRI case ? This one looks quite obscur. -- Richard Braun

Re: io_select EPIPE error case? [Was: [PATCH] Prepare pflocal/io.c for a revised hurdselect.c: Pipe case (for review)]

Richard Braun, le Mon 26 Nov 2012 14:37:23 +0100, a écrit : On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:34:04PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: In the read case, the end of file will be detected by a zero-read, not an EPIPE. Right. What about the SELECT_URG/POLLPRI case ? This one looks quite obscur. It

Re: io_select EPIPE error case? [Was: [PATCH] Prepare pflocal/io.c for a revised hurdselect.c: Pipe case (for review)]

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: Richard Braun, le Mon 26 Nov 2012 14:37:23 +0100, a écrit : Right. What about the SELECT_URG/POLLPRI case ? This one looks quite obscur. It is. IIRC for TCP/IP it's used for out-of-band data. I don't think we have an

hurd-20120710 FTBFS due to missing dependencies

Hello, When trying to build hurd-20120710 from source on a new box the build failed due to missing dependencies on flex|bison, pkg-config and libx11-dev (neither was installed by apt-get build-dep hurd, or build-essential or devscripts). From configure.in: AC_PROG_LEX AC_PROG_YACC AS_IF([test

Re: hurd-20120710 FTBFS due to missing dependencies

Hi, (note that this is debian-hurd@ material, since it is specific to the Debian packaging.) Alle lunedì 26 novembre 2012, Svante Signell ha scritto: When trying to build hurd-20120710 from source on a new box the build failed due to missing dependencies on flex|bison, pkg-config and

Re: hurd-20120710 FTBFS due to missing dependencies

On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 19:24 +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: Hi, (note that this is debian-hurd@ material, since it is specific to the Debian packaging.) Yes of course, sorry. Sent to the wrong list by mistake.