Re: hurd: PIE support

2017-12-27 Thread Simon Marchi
On 2017-12-27 10:44 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Simon Marchi, on mar. 26 déc. 2017 21:48:23 -0500, wrote: >> We would also need a ChangeLog entry. > > Well, I had put a ChangeLog entry at the top of the posted file. Is > something else needed? In the patch I have just sent to the

Re: Rust support

2017-12-27 Thread Joshua Branson
Awesome!!! Keep up the cool work! On Mon, Dec 25, 2017, at 8:19 PM, David Michael wrote: > Hi, > > I've been poking at cross-compiling Rust projects for Hurd on and off > for a couple of weeks, and I thought I'd upload what I have now for > comments. A new snapshot of my silly Hurd distro is

Re: Bug#881569: [Fwd: gdb: FTBFS on hurd-i386]

2017-12-27 Thread Svante Signell
On Tue, 2017-12-26 at 09:40 +0100, Héctor Orón Martínez wrote: > Hello Svante, > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 7:41 PM, Svante Signell > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > These patches was submitted to Debian November 13 2017. Nothing has > > happened so far, so maybe upstream

Re: race condition destroying condition variables

2017-12-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Brent W. Baccala, on mer. 27 déc. 2017 15:07:51 -0500, wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Samuel Thibault <[1]samuel.thiba...@gnu.org> > wrote: > > Ok, so even if Posix explicitly says that it has undefined behavior, > since nptl behaves fine we should probably behave fine too. >

Re: race condition destroying condition variables

2017-12-27 Thread Brent W. Baccala
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Brent W. Baccala, on mar. 26 déc. 2017 23:06:13 -0500, wrote: > > Also, the Linux source code in nptl/ includes the following comment: > > > > /* If there are waiters which have been already signalled

Re: race condition destroying condition variables

2017-12-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Brent W. Baccala, on mar. 26 déc. 2017 23:06:13 -0500, wrote: > Also, the Linux source code in nptl/ includes the following comment: > >   /* If there are waiters which have been already signalled or >      broadcasted, but still are using the pthread_cond_t structure, >      

Re: hurd: PIE support

2017-12-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Simon Marchi, on mar. 26 déc. 2017 21:48:23 -0500, wrote: > We would also need a ChangeLog entry. Well, I had put a ChangeLog entry at the top of the posted file. Is something else needed? In the patch I have just sent to the list I have directly put the gdb/ChangeLog update in addition

Re: hurd: PIE support

2017-12-27 Thread Simon Marchi
On 2017-12-22 11:55 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > PIE is being pushed more and more, so we have to support it in the Hurd > port :) > > The simplest way to fix things is to provide gdb with the entry address > through auxv. The attached patch implements this. Could you have a look >