Hi!
On Fri, 11 May 2012 01:32:52 +0200, Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@gnu.org
wrote:
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 10 May 2012 18:09:03 +0800, a écrit :
Also, what about data_set_element which is only used in hurd/dtable.c for
_hurd_fork_locks, which is manually run through twice in
Hi!
On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:17:01 +0800, I wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:38:41 +, Samuel Thibault
samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org wrote:
The branch, t/hooks has been created
This branch is missing from tschwinge/Roger_Whittaker (perhaps on purpose
-- please in such cases feel free to add
Hi!
On Thu, 10 May 2012 14:58:05 +0800, I wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2012 11:17:01 +0800, I wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:38:41 +, Samuel Thibault
samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org wrote:
The branch, t/hooks has been created
This branch is missing from tschwinge/Roger_Whittaker (perhaps on
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 10 May 2012 11:17:01 +0800, a écrit :
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:38:41 +, Samuel Thibault
samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org wrote:
The branch, t/hooks has been created
at 56798c444bc584c118b69a3506c4050b34edc35f (commit)
- Log
Hi!
On Thu, 10 May 2012 10:44:00 +0200, Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@gnu.org
wrote:
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 10 May 2012 11:17:01 +0800, a écrit :
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:38:41 +, Samuel Thibault
samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org wrote:
The branch, t/hooks has been created
at
On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 18:09 +0800, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
And, might something like that in fact be responsible for the issue I had
already seen months ago, but have just earlier today finally posted as
http://www.bddebian.com:/~hurd-web/open_issues/fork_deadlock/?
Thomas, I took the
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 10 May 2012 15:18:22 +0800, a écrit :
refs/top-bases/tschwinge/Roger_Whittaker was updated on Savannah, but not
tschwinge/Roger_Whittaker. This might have happened if the former was
pushed first and then the connection terminated, for example.
That's possible. tg takes
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 10 May 2012 18:09:03 +0800, a écrit :
How did this work before, though?
I'd say it didn't.
Due to __symbol_set_attribute
specifying weak linkage for the static case, I can see why we didn't get
undefined symbol errors when linking for the static case, but what about
Hi!
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:38:41 +, Samuel Thibault
samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org wrote:
The branch, t/hooks has been created
at 56798c444bc584c118b69a3506c4050b34edc35f (commit)
- Log -
commit
