Hi,
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 09:17:49PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
Hurdng - the project of porting hurd translators to another
microkernel beside mach such as L4.
That is not fully correct. The original port to L4 was simply named
Hurd/L4 -- which is exactly what it was: A port of the
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], le Wed 01 Aug 2007 18:30:20 +0200, a écrit :
The main reason parts of Hurd are slow and such is that code in
the translators (such as the pager code in ext2fs) haven't been
optimized.
Well, that is only partially true: Nobody has ever really profiled it;
but my
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 01:33:12PM +0200, Anders Breindahl wrote:
I recall something about fork()s being expensive on the Hurd/Mach, and
that someone ran tests that showed 500forks per second versus a
somewhat larger figure on Linux.
The somewhat larger figure was actually something like
On 200707252117, Michael Casadevall wrote:
First, I think its very important to clarify the terms Hurd and mach
Mach - the underlying microkernel used by all versions of Hurd
Hurd - the userland translators which snap into the kernel providing
userland services, and (in theory) are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Very long message :-). Anyway, I'll reply to the best of my ability
First, I think its very important to clarify the terms Hurd and mach
Mach - the underlying microkernel used by all versions of Hurd
Hurd - the userland translators which snap into
