On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:24 PM Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> Samuel Thibault, le mar. 19 janv. 2021 01:21:05 +0100, a ecrit:
> > H.J. Lu, le lun. 18 janv. 2021 16:17:16 -0800, a ecrit:
> > > Why doesn't hurd ld.so build script mark strncpy as needed?
> >
> > I don't even know what "hurd ld.so build
Samuel Thibault, le mar. 19 janv. 2021 01:21:05 +0100, a ecrit:
> H.J. Lu, le lun. 18 janv. 2021 16:17:16 -0800, a ecrit:
> > Why doesn't hurd ld.so build script mark strncpy as needed?
>
> I don't even know what "hurd ld.so build script" is.
More precisely, I don't see why hurd should be doing
H.J. Lu, le lun. 18 janv. 2021 16:17:16 -0800, a ecrit:
> String function usage in ld.so must be carefully managed.
Sure.
> Why doesn't hurd ld.so build script mark strncpy as needed?
I don't even know what "hurd ld.so build script" is. AFAIK there is not
much hurd-specific there except
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 4:04 PM Samuel Thibault via Libc-alpha
wrote:
>
> (leaving gcc out, it's really out of the story, it just happens to
> expose support for ifunc)
>
> Joseph Myers, le lun. 18 janv. 2021 20:05:44 +, a ecrit:
> >
(leaving gcc out, it's really out of the story, it just happens to
expose support for ifunc)
Joseph Myers, le lun. 18 janv. 2021 20:05:44 +, a ecrit:
> /scratch/jmyers/glibc-bot/install/compilers/i686-gnu/lib/gcc/i686-glibc-gnu/11.0.0/../../../../i686-glibc-gnu/bin/ld:
>
>
Hello,
Joseph Myers, le lun. 18 janv. 2021 20:05:44 +, a ecrit:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Thanks (and sorry for the delay), pushed "Hurd: Enable ifunc by default"
> > to master branch in commit e9cb89b936f831a02318d45fc4ddb06f7be55ae4, and
> > cherry-picked into
On Wed, 13 Jan 2021, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks (and sorry for the delay), pushed "Hurd: Enable ifunc by default"
> to master branch in commit e9cb89b936f831a02318d45fc4ddb06f7be55ae4, and
> cherry-picked into releases/gcc-10 branch in commit
>
Hi!
Thanks (and sorry for the delay), pushed "Hurd: Enable ifunc by default"
to master branch in commit e9cb89b936f831a02318d45fc4ddb06f7be55ae4, and
cherry-picked into releases/gcc-10 branch in commit
92b131491c22eb4e4b663d226e9d97f1fd693063, releases/gcc-9 branch in commit
Ping?
Samuel Thibault, le dim. 08 nov. 2020 23:52:51 +0100, a ecrit:
> The binutils bugs seem to have been fixed.
>
> 2020-11-08 Samuel Thibault
>
> gcc/
> * config.gcc: Enable default_gnu_indirect_function in *-*-gnu*
> target (but not *-*-kfreebsd*-gnu |
Almudena Garcia, le lun. 21 déc. 2020 01:05:29 +0100, a ecrit:
> What do you need exactly?
I need gcc people to apply it.
> How can we test It?
The answer would be lengthy. Basically recompile gcc with it, write or
find a program that uses it, and check that it works.
But I have already done
What do you need exactly? How can we test It?
El lun, 21 dic 2020 a las 0:11, Samuel Thibault ()
escribió:
> Ping?
>
> Samuel Thibault, le dim. 08 nov. 2020 23:52:51 +0100, a ecrit:
> > The binutils bugs seem to have been fixed.
> >
> > 2020-11-08 Samuel Thibault
> >
> > gcc/
> >
Ping?
Samuel Thibault, le dim. 08 nov. 2020 23:52:51 +0100, a ecrit:
> The binutils bugs seem to have been fixed.
>
> 2020-11-08 Samuel Thibault
>
> gcc/
> * config.gcc: Enable default_gnu_indirect_function in *-*-gnu*
> target (but not *-*-kfreebsd*-gnu |
Ping?
Samuel Thibault, le dim. 08 nov. 2020 23:52:51 +0100, a ecrit:
> The binutils bugs seem to have been fixed.
>
> 2020-11-08 Samuel Thibault
>
> gcc/
> * config.gcc: Enable default_gnu_indirect_function in *-*-gnu*
> target (but not *-*-kfreebsd*-gnu |
Ping?
I was able to pass glibc's complete ifunc tests with no problem.
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, le dim. 08 nov. 2020 23:52:51 +0100, a ecrit:
> The binutils bugs seem to have been fixed.
>
> 2020-11-08 Samuel Thibault
>
> gcc/
> * config.gcc: Enable default_gnu_indirect_function
14 matches
Mail list logo
