Re: [PATCH] hurd: align -p and -pg behavior on Linux

2016-03-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Thomas Schwinge, on Tue 29 Mar 2016 23:19:09 +0200, wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:46:36 +0100, I wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:00:23 +0200, Samuel Thibault > > wrote: > > > On Linux, -p and -pg do not make gcc link against libc_p.a, only > > > -profile does

Re: [PATCH] hurd: align -p and -pg behavior on Linux

2016-03-29 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:46:36 +0100, I wrote: > On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:00:23 +0200, Samuel Thibault > wrote: > > On Linux, -p and -pg do not make gcc link against libc_p.a, only > > -profile does (as documented in r11246), and thus people expect -p > > (Yo, 20 years

Re: [PATCH] hurd: align -p and -pg behavior on Linux

2016-02-25 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Thu 25 Feb 2016 00:18:21 +0100, wrote: > Thomas Schwinge, on Wed 24 Feb 2016 23:46:36 +0100, wrote: > > I guess getting -D_REENTRANT for -pthread won't do us any harm? > > It won't. (Actually we've been using this in Debian for a long time). Samuel

Re: [PATCH] hurd: align -p and -pg behavior on Linux

2016-02-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schwinge, on Wed 24 Feb 2016 23:46:36 +0100, wrote: > I guess getting -D_REENTRANT for -pthread won't do us any harm? It won't. > > --- gcc/config/i386/gnu.h.orig 2015-09-17 21:41:13.0 + > > +++ gcc/config/i386/gnu.h 2015-09-17 23:03:57.0 + > > @@ -27,11

Re: [PATCH] hurd: align -p and -pg behavior on Linux

2016-02-24 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! Sorry for the late answer... On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:00:23 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > On Linux, -p and -pg do not make gcc link against libc_p.a, only > -profile does (as documented in r11246), and thus people expect -p (Yo, 20 years ago...) > and -pg to work

Re: [PATCH] hurd: align -p and -pg behavior on Linux

2016-01-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ping? Samuel Thibault, on Sun 11 Oct 2015 20:29:10 +0200, wrote: > Ping? > > (I don't have commit access) > > Samuel Thibault, le Sat 19 Sep 2015 14:00:23 +0200, a écrit : > > On Linux, -p and -pg do not make gcc link against libc_p.a, only > > -profile does (as documented in r11246), and thus

Re: [PATCH] hurd: align -p and -pg behavior on Linux

2015-10-12 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Samuel! On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 14:00:23 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > On Linux, -p and -pg do not make gcc link against libc_p.a, only > -profile does (as documented in r11246), and thus people expect -p > and -pg to work without libc_p.a installed (it is actually

Re: [PATCH] hurd: align -p and -pg behavior on Linux

2015-10-11 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ping? (I don't have commit access) Samuel Thibault, le Sat 19 Sep 2015 14:00:23 +0200, a écrit : > On Linux, -p and -pg do not make gcc link against libc_p.a, only > -profile does (as documented in r11246), and thus people expect -p > and -pg to work without libc_p.a installed (it is actually

Re: [PATCH] hurd: align -p and -pg behavior on Linux

2015-09-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ping? Samuel Thibault, le Sat 19 Sep 2015 14:00:23 +0200, a écrit : > On Linux, -p and -pg do not make gcc link against libc_p.a, only > -profile does (as documented in r11246), and thus people expect -p > and -pg to work without libc_p.a installed (it is actually even not > available any more in