Constantine Kousoulos wrote:
...
port_err=mach_port_allocate(mach_task_self(),
MACH_PORT_RIGHT_RECEIVE, name);
if (port_err!=KERN_SUCCESS)
error(1, port_err, cannot allocate port, %d, port_err);
msg_err=mach_msg(msg_body, MACH_RCV_MSG, 0, sizeof(msg_body),
XXX,
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 10:32:17AM +0200, Constantine Kousoulos wrote:
I bypassed the previous problem using
mach_port_t rcv = mach_reply_port();
msg_err=mach_msg(header, MACH_RCV_MSG, 0, sizeof(header),
rcv,
MACH_MSG_TIMEOUT_NONE,
Richard Braun wrote:
... When threads are in different tasks, the problem
is usually solved by a server dedicated to registering ports and known
by all threads. The Hurd actually uses the file system for this (see
the Hurd function file_name_lookup()). It's not the role of Mach to
provide such a
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:31:27PM +0200, Constantine Kousoulos wrote:
I'm trying to set up a simple server that just receives messages (not
threaded). So, i have written
[...]
Out of curiosity: Why are you working at such a low abstraction level?
You have some specific task in mind, or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:31:27PM +0200, Constantine Kousoulos wrote:
I'm trying to set up a simple server that just receives messages (not
threaded). So, i have written
[...]
Out of curiosity: Why are you working at such a low abstraction level?
You have some
On Sat, Nov 25, 2006 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Constantine Kousoulos wrote:
Now it's my turn to be curious: can i do the same things at a
higher abstraction level?? :) I didn't realise that the
abstraction level was so low. I just try to utilise the interfaces
that mach.texi and hurd.texi
I'm trying to set up a simple server that just receives messages
(not threaded). So, i have written
/* for port allocation */
ipc_space_t ist;
kern_return_t port_err;
mach_port_t name;
task_t self;
/* for message reception */
mach_msg_return_t msg_err;
mach_msg_header_t msg_body;
