Samuel Thibault, le Tue 14 Apr 2015 18:05:51 +0200, a écrit :
Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 14 Apr 2015 17:59:40 +0200, a écrit :
they have intimate knowledge about the operating system kernel
they're running on,
But isn't this needed only for tsan?
More precisely, I see lsan only using
Hi!
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015 17:03:46 +0200, Samuel Thibault samuel.thiba...@gnu.org
wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 14 Apr 2015 15:08:51 +0200, a écrit :
For work I've been having a look at -fsanitize in gcc. It's not as
powerful as valgrind, but it should provide very good feedback, and
Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 14 Apr 2015 17:59:40 +0200, a écrit :
they have intimate knowledge about the operating system kernel
they're running on,
But isn't this needed only for tsan?
Samuel
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 14 Apr 2015 15:08:51 +0200, a écrit :
For work I've been having a look at -fsanitize in gcc. It's not as
powerful as valgrind, but it should provide very good feedback, and
apart from tsan, it seems to be very easy to port to other systems
(basically tell the ucontext
Hello,
For work I've been having a look at -fsanitize in gcc. It's not as
powerful as valgrind, but it should provide very good feedback, and
apart from tsan, it seems to be very easy to port to other systems
(basically tell the ucontext layout, the rest is mostly glibc-generic
actually), could
