Then, does Debian repositories includes all new PCI Arbitrer and
libpciaccess0 updates?
Samuel asked me to test the latest versions of netdde, libpciaccess0 and
hurd, in my Thinkpad T60, but I don't know if I simply have to "apt
full-upgrade", or I need to do a manual compilation from upstream
El
Hi,
El 3/11/19 a les 21:48, Samuel Thibault ha escrit:
> Hello,
>
> Uploaded fixed netdde, pciutils, libpciaccess, and commited this
> pci-arbiter cleanup!
>
Great!
Now I have some questions:
- You said libpciaccess upstream code for the Hurd doesn't match the one
in the Debian package.
Hi!
[ BTW it seems like something on the gnu.org side is mandling UTF-8
characters? :/ ]
On Sat, 2019-11-09 at 11:54:15 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Joan Lledó via Bug reports for the GNU Hurd, le sam. 09 nov. 2019 10:50:18
> +0100, a ecrit:
> > And, about pciutils, what did you do?
>
Almudena Garcia, le sam. 09 nov. 2019 15:15:31 +0100, a ecrit:
> but I don't know if I simply have to "apt full-upgrade",
That's exactly it, no manual compilation needed. Just make sure to be
getting upgrades from the "unreleased" distrib.
Samuel
> That's exactly it, no manual compilation needed. Just make sure to be
> getting upgrades from the "unreleased" distrib.
Thanks. This week I'll try to test It
El sáb., 9 nov. 2019 a las 15:21, Samuel Thibault ()
escribió:
> Almudena Garcia, le sam. 09 nov. 2019 15:15:31 +0100, a ecrit:
> > but
Joan Lledó via Bug reports for the GNU Hurd, le sam. 09 nov. 2019 10:35:31
+0100, a ecrit:
> From: Joan Lledó
>
> * pci-arbiter/pcifs.c:
> * create_fs_tree:
> Remove all memset() previous to snprintf() calls.
Applied, thanks!
> ---
> pci-arbiter/pcifs.c | 4
> 1 file
Concerning packages uploaded to the "unreleased"
distribution, a repository if there was one would be on
https://salsa.debian.org/hurd-team I however don't create one for each
and very package I upload to "unreleased". Normally the patchs uploaded
there are already submitted upstream or to a
Hi,
Thanks for your explanations, Samuel. Then I'll take your changes on the
libpciaccess patch, fix the closedir() issue and send it to upstream.
I was also wondering if after your changes, libpciaccess would support
nested arbiters, or if is that something we want at all.
About pciutils, I've
From: Joan Lledó
* pci-arbiter/pcifs.c:
* create_fs_tree:
Remove all memset() previous to snprintf() calls.
---
pci-arbiter/pcifs.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pci-arbiter/pcifs.c b/pci-arbiter/pcifs.c
index cc08fad0..aaee7f0b 100644
---
Hi,
El 3/11/19 a les 17:47, Samuel Thibault ha escrit:
> The memset still seems spurious to me, isn't it?
>
Yes, I wrote it to ensure a '\0' was written at the end of the
string, no matter its size. But if snprintf() already null
terminates, then there's no need for the memset().
El 9/11/19 a les 10:48, Joan Lledó via Bug reports for the GNU Hurd ha
escrit:
> Now I have some questions:
>
> - You said libpciaccess upstream code for the Hurd doesn't match the one
> in the Debian package. Where is the debian repo for the package? I found
> [1] but it doesn't seem to have
Joan Lledó, le sam. 09 nov. 2019 17:36:19 +0100, a ecrit:
> I was also wondering if after your changes, libpciaccess would support
> nested arbiters, or if is that something we want at all.
We'd want this, yes.
> About pciutils, I've seen our patch doesn't use the RPC get_ndevs(), so
> no need
12 matches
Mail list logo
