Hi!
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:00:45 -0300, Diego Nieto Cid wrote:
> Nonetheless, I'd like to document what's going on here. [...]
Thanks for the very nice text -- I have now put it into the web pages,
almost verbatim. (I did not check the console parts for factual
correctness.) If you feel like
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 10:17:11PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Diego Nieto Cid, le Sun 30 Oct 2011 18:00:45 -0300, a écrit :
> > Although I haven't tested it I beleive the patch sent as a reply should
> > fix this problem. Could someone review it?
>
> Which reply?
>
Sorry, that was me double
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 30 Oct 2011 22:17:11 +0100, a écrit :
> Diego Nieto Cid, le Sun 30 Oct 2011 18:00:45 -0300, a écrit :
> > Although I haven't tested it I beleive the patch sent as a reply should
> > fix this problem. Could someone review it?
>
> Which reply?
Oops, nevermind, it arrived in
Diego Nieto Cid, le Sun 30 Oct 2011 18:00:45 -0300, a écrit :
> Although I haven't tested it I beleive the patch sent as a reply should
> fix this problem. Could someone review it?
Which reply?
Samuel
Hi,
Arch has been suffering from console lock-ups due to inactivity. The
system remains active and it's usable through other means such as a SSH
session.
On the other hand, Debian has showed no such behavior. The different
behaviors boil down to Debian's libports_stability[1] patch which is
missi
