Re: problems with a subhurd

Hi, On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 12:34:09PM +0200, Justus Winter wrote: > I recommend against shutting down subhurds. This is a regression, though -- I'm pretty sure I used `halt` and/or `reboot` in subhurds in the past. (Sometimes it failed; but it never broke my main instance IIRC...) -antrik-

Re: problems with a subhurd

Hey :) "Brent W. Baccala" writes: > Our current setup is that PID 5 (ext2fs) runs first, then starts PID 2 > (startup), which starts PID 1 (init). Weird. The cleanest solution, of > course, would be to have proc actually respect these parenting > relationships, then

Re: problems with a subhurd

Hello, Brent W. Baccala, on Wed 31 Aug 2016 13:35:07 -1000, wrote: >   Also, after fixing bug #1, this screws up startup's attempt to start a new > shell if the old one dies. Note that even on success, "try" is incremented, i.e. /bin/shd is tried instead of the shell. > Maybe startup shouldn't