* quoting myself, from Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 02:11:34PM CET:
>
> There is still another failure in libltdl/m4/ltdl.m4: it won't reject
> the external libltdl if only libtldl.so is new enough but ltdl.h is too
> old (can happen if LDFLAGS was set correctly but CPPFLAGS wasn't). In
> that case there
* Lynn Ten Eyck wrote on Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 03:53:29PM CET:
> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 14:11 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> > The failure of 25 is new to me. Do you have a libltdl.so.7 installed in
> > a place where the link editor finds it by default? If yes, is there a
> > libltdl.la file in
Hello, Ralf -
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 14:11 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> The failure of 25 is new to me. Do you have a libltdl.so.7 installed in
> a place where the link editor finds it by default? If yes, is there a
> libltdl.la file installed alongside with it? If not, why not, who
> remove
Hello Lynn,
Thanks for the report.
* Lynn F. Ten Eyck wrote on Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 11:44:02PM CET:
>
> I installed libtool 2.1a from CVS tonight and installed it. The self-
> test failed two tests. The log reports most of the configuration
> information.
> I installed the latest released
