Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> This should be $LD -r here, no? AFAICS this failure happens inside the
> low max_cmd_len test. This looks like a regression caused by the patch
> that removed _LT_SYS_DYNAMIC_LINKER from _LT_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG. (If that
> turns out to be true, I am glad we did not make thi
Hello Peter,
* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 06:36:22AM CET:
>
> I admit that I don't understand the failures like this one yet.
>
> Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote:
> >> /convenience.at:265: $LIBTOOL --tag=GCJ --mode=link $GCJ $GCJFLAGS
> >> $LDFLAGS -o liba12.la liba1.la liba2.la -rpa
Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote:
Hi Nelson,
I admit that I don't understand the failures like this one yet.
>> /convenience.at:265: $LIBTOOL --tag=GCJ --mode=link $GCJ $GCJFLAGS $LDFLAGS
>> -o liba12.la liba1.la liba2.la -rpath /notexist
>> stderr:
>> stdout:
>> libtool: link: gcj -shared -Wl,-z -Wl,te
