Re: automake/libtool question

2006-09-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:05:34PM CEST: > On 9/12/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Yep. If this one turns out to be non-fixable, we may just have to > >document that users may need to do both for linking against non-libtool > >libraries: add -R/some/path

Re: automake/libtool question

2006-09-12 Thread David Everly
On 9/12/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello David, * David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:11:16PM CEST: > On 9/12/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >* David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:02:47AM CEST: > >> > >> HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64 > >> Libtool

Re: automake/libtool question

2006-09-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello David, * David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:11:16PM CEST: > On 9/12/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >* David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:02:47AM CEST: > >> > >> HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64 > >> Libtool is creating a script that wrappers the non-installed foo

Re: automake/libtool question

2006-09-12 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
[ Cc:ing both lists; let's drop the automake list ] Hello David, * David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:02:47AM CEST: > > HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64 > automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6 > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60 > ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18 22:14:06) > For the in