* David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 04:05:34PM CEST:
> On 9/12/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Yep. If this one turns out to be non-fixable, we may just have to
> >document that users may need to do both for linking against non-libtool
> >libraries: add -R/some/path
On 9/12/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello David,
* David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:11:16PM CEST:
> On 9/12/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:02:47AM CEST:
> >>
> >> HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64
> >> Libtool
Hello David,
* David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 02:11:16PM CEST:
> On 9/12/06, Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:02:47AM CEST:
> >>
> >> HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64
> >> Libtool is creating a script that wrappers the non-installed foo
[ Cc:ing both lists; let's drop the automake list ]
Hello David,
* David Everly wrote on Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 01:02:47AM CEST:
>
> HP-UX B.11.23 U ia64
> automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6
> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60
> ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.5.22 (1.1220.2.365 2005/12/18 22:14:06)
> For the in