On Wednesday 09 May 2007, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Mike Frysinger wrote on Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:34:31PM CEST:
> > -Bstatic would be valid for the compiler driver regardless ... if you had
> > a directory in $PWD named "static" ...
>
> If you have a directory named static and used that as argum
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Tue, May 08, 2007 at 06:34:31PM CEST:
>
> -Bstatic would be valid for the compiler driver regardless ... if you had a
> directory in $PWD named "static" ...
If you have a directory named static and used that as argument for -B,
you deserve trouble. Also, isn't -B to be
On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Mike Frysinger wrote on Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:41:44AM CEST:
> > looking through current libtool code, i dont see any places that it
> > allows gcc's -B arguments through to the linking stage ... is there such
> > code
>
> Currently not. It would
Hello Mike,
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:41:44AM CEST:
> looking through current libtool code, i dont see any places that it allows
> gcc's -B arguments through to the linking stage ... is there such code
Currently not. It would have to be at least a bit smart, too, to avoi
looking through current libtool code, i dont see any places that it allows
gcc's -B arguments through to the linking stage ... is there such code or
does it need to be added to the allowed flag list for valid linking flags ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message pa
