* Christopher Hulbert wrote on Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:53:30AM CEST:
>
> Ah, I forgot about the MSVC patches (i.e. I didn't apply any patches,
> it was a fresh checkout of the libtool cvs sources). I'll search the
> patches for it and see if that helps. Is there any reason it's not
> already appli
On 8/28/06, Peter Ekberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:20:10AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Christopher,
>
> * Christopher Hulbert wrote on Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:21:25PM CEST:
> > Piecewise linking with the MS archiver (lib) doesn't work. Every
> > invocation of
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:20:10AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello Christopher,
>
> * Christopher Hulbert wrote on Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:21:25PM CEST:
> > Piecewise linking with the MS archiver (lib) doesn't work. Every
> > invocation of the lib clobbers the old one. The solution is to lis
Hello Christopher,
* Christopher Hulbert wrote on Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 07:21:25PM CEST:
> Piecewise linking with the MS archiver (lib) doesn't work. Every
> invocation of the lib clobbers the old one. The solution is to list
> the library as the first "object" (really anywhere should be fine) in
>
Piecewise linking with the MS archiver (lib) doesn't work. Every
invocation of the lib clobbers the old one. The solution is to list
the library as the first "object" (really anywhere should be fine) in
the next lib command. I'm not sure how to patch this. It looks like
the piecewise linking code
