Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Yes. HP-UX /bin/sh is known to dump core in
case `command that produces more than 1 KB of output` in
and I don't know how much output other compilers generate when given the
-V option.
But say, why is that HP-UX shell issue not listed in the Autoconf
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
and note that with C++, your patch sets ${wl} to `-Qoption ld ' as well,
not to `-Wl,'.
Yes. Indeed I don't know whether -Qoption ld arg1,arg2,arg3will
pass arg1, arg2, arg3 separately to the linker or glued together. I hope
the tests in libtool HEAD will detect
Hi Bruno, all,
+ _LT_AC_TAGVAR(whole_archive_flag_spec,
$1)='${wl}--whole-archive`new_convenience=; for conv in
+$convenience\\; do test -z \$conv\ ||
new_convenience=\$new_convenience,$conv\; done; $echo
\$new_convenience\`+${wl}--no-whole-archive'
Are you sure the compiler driver
Hi Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:01:31PM CEST:
Here is a revised patch. I changed the recognition of the Sun compilers,
and the whole_archive_flag_spec and postdeps, so that now all 112 tests PASS.
Cool.
With this patch, the FAILs are turned into PASS; all tests
Hi,
Here is a patch that adds support for Sun's C and C++ compilers 5.9, ported
from Solaris to Linux. They exist for x86 and x86_64; I tested it only on x86.
The compiler executable for C is called 'c89' and 'c99' (two slightly
different programs); for C++ it is called 'CC'.
Without this patch,
Hi Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, May 08, 2006 at 09:44:42PM CEST:
Here is a patch that adds support for Sun's C and C++ compilers 5.9, ported
from Solaris to Linux. They exist for x86 and x86_64; I tested it only on x86.
Thanks!
The compiler executable for C is called 'c89' and 'c99'
Hi Bruno,
* Bruno Haible wrote on Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:40:59PM CEST:
The compiler executable for C is called 'c89' and 'c99' (two slightly
different programs); for C++ it is called 'CC'.
How unfortunate. Several compilers on GNU/Linux install themselves with
links or wrappers
